Cited by 112Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resting-state Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates of Sevoflurane-induced Unconsciousness

Open access

Abstract

AbstractAbstract: Sevoflurane-induced unconsciousness leads to a widespread reduction in brain activity. Functional connectivity is selectively reduced within the default mode and ventral attention networks. Motion artifact, a prevalent confounding variable in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies involving anesthetic agents, leads to spurious results if not addressed. Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background: Blood oxygen level–dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been used to study the effects of anesthetic agents on correlated intrinsic neural activity. Previous studies have focused primarily on intravenous agents. The authors studied the effects of sevoflurane, an inhaled anesthetic. Methods: Resting-state BOLD fMRI was acquired from 10 subjects before sedation and from 9 subjects rendered unresponsive by 1.2% sevoflurane. The fMRI data were analyzed taking particular care to minimize the impact of artifact generated by head motion. Results: BOLD correlations were specifically weaker within the default mode network and ventral attention network during sevoflurane-induced unconsciousness, especially between anterior and posterior midline regions. Reduced functional connectivity between these same networks and the thalamus was also spatially localized to the midline frontal regions. The amplitude of BOLD signal fluctuations was substantially reduced across all brain regions. The importance of censoring epochs contaminated by head motion was demonstrated by comparative analyses. Conclusions: Sevoflurane-induced unconsciousness is associated with both globally reduced BOLD signal amplitudes and selectively reduced functional connectivity within cortical networks associated with consciousness (default mode network) and orienting to salient external stimuli (ventral attention network). Scrupulous attention to minimizing the impact of head motion artifact is critical in fMRI studies using anesthetic agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0000000000000731

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Palanca, B. J. A., Mitra, A., Larson-Prior, L., Snyder, A. Z., Avidan, M. S., & Raichle, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • From the Department of Anesthesiology (B.J.A.P., M.S.A.), Department of Radiology (A.M., L.L.-P., A.Z.S., M.E.R.), Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.S.A.), Department of Neurology (L.L.-P., A.Z.S., M.E.R.), and Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology (M.E.R.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; and Department of Biomedical Engineering (M.E.R.), Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.
Corresponding author
Palanca, Ben Julian A.
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2015-08
Volume
123
Issue
2
Pages
346-356
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106283125
Cited by
112
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5
FWCI
8.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR000450, UL1TR000448)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R25MH071279, U25 MH071279-01, F30MH106253)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P30NS048056)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024992)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
sevoflurane, anesthetic-induced unconsciousness, resting-state functional connectivity, default mode network, ventral attention network, head motion artifacts, BOLD signal fluctuations, thalamus
MeSH terms
Sevoflurane, Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Methyl Ethers, Nerve Net, Rest, Unconsciousness, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review