Cited by 23Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Propofol-induced Changes in α-β Sensorimotor Cortical Connectivity

Open access
Malekmohammadi, Mahsa, AuYong, Nicholas, Price, Collin M., Tsolaki, Evangelia, Hudson, Andrew E., Pouratian, Nader·2018·Anesthesiology

Abstract

Background: Anesthetics are believed to alter functional connectivity across brain regions. However, network-level analyses of anesthesia, particularly in humans, are sparse. The authors hypothesized that propofol-induced loss of consciousness results in functional disconnection of human sensorimotor cortices underlying the loss of volitional motor responses. Methods: The authors recorded local field potentials from sensorimotor cortices in patients with Parkinson disease (N = 12) and essential tremor (N = 7) undergoing deep brain stimulation surgery, before and after propofol-induced loss of consciousness. Local spectral power and interregional connectivity (coherence and imaginary coherence) were evaluated separately across conditions for the two populations. Results: Propofol anesthesia caused power increases for frequencies between 2 and 100 Hz across the sensorimotor cortices and a shift of the dominant spectral peak in α and β frequencies toward lower frequencies (median ± SD peak frequency: 24.5 ± 2.6 Hz to 12.8 ± 2.3 Hz in Parkinson disease; 13.8 ± 2.1 Hz to 12.1 ± 1.0 Hz in essential tremor). Despite local increases in power, sensorimotor cortical coherence was suppressed with propofol in both cohorts, specifically in β frequencies (18 to 29 Hz) for Parkinson disease and α and β (10 to 48 Hz) in essential tremor. Conclusions: The decrease in functional connectivity between sensory and motor cortices, despite an increase in local spectral power, suggests that propofol causes a functional disconnection of cortices with increases in autonomous activity within cortical regions. This pattern occurs across diseases evaluated, suggesting that these may be generalizable effects of propofol in patients with movement disorders and beyond. Sensorimotor network disruption may underlie anesthetic-induced loss of volitional control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aln.0000000000001940

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electrocorticography during propofol and ketamine anesthesia in human and non-human primates reveals disrupted functional connectivity across S1 and M1 cortex, as well as altered beta oscillations typically associated with feedback processing.

    “Electrocorticography during propofol (Malekmohammadi et al., 2018) and ketamine (Schroeder et al., 2016) anesthesia in human and non-human primates, respectively, reveals disrupted functional connectivity across the S1 and M1 cortex, as well as altered beta oscillations, which are typically associated with feedback processing (Bastos et al., 2015).”

    From Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis (2020) · cites this paper as Malekmohammadi et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malekmohammadi, M., AuYong, N., Price, C. M., Tsolaki, E., Hudson, A. E., & Pouratian, N.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Malekmohammadi, Mahsa
Venue
Anesthesiology
Published
2018-02
Volume
128
Issue
2
Pages
305-316
ISSN
0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2765882424
Cited by
23
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Anesthesiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Parkinson Disease Association
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (K08GM121961)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS097782)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (K23EB014326)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
propofol anesthesia, sensorimotor cortex, functional connectivity, alpha oscillations, beta oscillations, local field potentials, Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, movement disorders, loss of consciousness, deep brain stimulation, spectral power, coherence, imaginary coherence
MeSH terms
Aged, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Neural Pathways, Parkinson Disease, Propofol, Anesthetics, Intravenous, Essential Tremor, Deep Brain Stimulation, Sensorimotor Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review