Cited by 389Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityNosocomial Infections in ICUInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management

Candida bloodstream infections in intensive care units: Analysis of the extended prevalence of infection in intensive care unit study*

Kett, Daniel H., Azoulay, Elie, Echeverria, Pablo M., Vincent, Jean-Louis·2011·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Objectives To provide a global, up-to-date picture of the prevalence, treatment, and outcomes of Candida bloodstream infections in intensive care unit patients and compare Candida with bacterial bloodstream infection. Design A retrospective analysis of the Extended Prevalence of Infection in the ICU Study (EPIC II). Demographic, physiological, infection-related and therapeutic data were collected. Patients were grouped as having Candida, Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and combined Candida/bacterial bloodstream infection. Outcome data were assessed at intensive care unit and hospital discharge. Setting EPIC II included 1265 intensive care units in 76 countries. Patients Patients in participating intensive care units on study day. Interventions None. Measurement and main results Of the 14,414 patients in EPIC II, 99 patients had Candida bloodstream infections for a prevalence of 6.9 per 1000 patients. Sixty-one patients had candidemia alone and 38 patients had combined bloodstream infections. Candida albicans (n = 70) was the predominant species. Primary therapy included monotherapy with fluconazole (n = 39), caspofungin (n = 16), and a polyene-based product (n = 12). Combination therapy was infrequently used (n = 10). Compared with patients with Gram-positive (n = 420) and Gram-negative (n = 264) bloodstream infections, patients with candidemia were more likely to have solid tumors (p Conclusion Candidemia remains a significant problem in intensive care units patients. In the E…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318206c1ca

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Limited data from resource-limited settings suggest that timely administration of antimicrobials in patients with sepsis and septic shock is beneficial and potentially feasible.

    “Limited data from resource-limited settings suggest that timely administration of antimicrobials in patients with sepsis and septic shock is beneficial and potentially feasible (121-126).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kett, D. H., Azoulay, E., Echeverria, P. M., & Vincent, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2011-04
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
665-670
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080363965
Cited by
389
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 17
FWCI
11.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
candidemia, intensive care unit, Candida albicans, antifungal therapy, fluconazole, caspofungin, polyene antibiotics, ICU mortality, length of hospital stay, gram-negative bacteremia, solid tumors, nosocomial infections
MeSH terms
Caspofungin, Aged, Antifungal Agents, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Cross Infection, Female, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Fluconazole, Prevalence, Sepsis, Echinocandins, Lipopeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review