The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 52 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment
Open accessAbstract
Objective Although research supports the use of appropriately administered stimulant medication to treat children with ADHD, poor adherence and early termination undermine the efficacy of this treatment in real-world settings. Moreover, adherence measures often rely on parent report of medication use, and their validity and reliability are unknown.Method Drawing on data from 254 participants in the NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, we examine the discrepancy between parents' verbal reports of medication adherence and physiological adherence measures determined via methylphenidate saliva assays collected at four time points during the 14-month treatment period. In addition, we examine the impact of physiologically documented medication adherence on parent- and teacher-reported outcomes through 14 months.Results Overall, nearly one fourth (24.5%) of the saliva samples indicated nonadherence. Among subjects, 63 (24.8%) of the 254 participants were nonadherent on 50% or more of their repeated saliva assays. Only 136 (53.5%) of the subjects were adherent at every time point at which saliva assays were taken, indicating that some degree of nonadherence characterized nearly half of all other NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder-treated children. Findings also indicated that nonadherence produced greater deleterious effects in children in the medication-only condition compared with those receiving both medication and behavioral treatment.Conclusions Same-day saliva methylphenidate assays suggest that nearly half of the parents are inaccurate informants of their child's ADHD medication adherence and that parents may overestimate actual (physiological) adherence. This finding suggests the need for interventions to improve accuracy of parental report. Clinicians need to focus on adherence enhancement strategies to improve outcomes of children being treated with medication, particularly when benefits are suboptimal.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In the MTA medication-treated sample, same-day saliva methylphenidate assays indicated that nearly one fourth of samples and about one fourth of children were nonadherent, while parent report identified only 3.1% as nonadherent. Physiological nonadherence was associated with worse ADHD symptom outcomes, especially in medication-only treatment.
Key findings
- Among 254 children with readable saliva assays, 63 (24.8%) were physiologically nonadherent on ≥50% of assays; 136 (53.5%) were adherent at every available time point, and 31 (12.2%) were nonadherent on all collected samples. The abstract reports 24.5% of saliva samples as nonadherent, while the Results report 176 of 748 (23.5%) samples below the detectable threshold.
- Parent report was much more optimistic: 228 of 254 parents (89.8%) reported adherence on all occasions, and only 8 (3.1%) reported nonadherence using the same ≥50% threshold. Concordance was “slight” (reported κ = 0.12, p < .001); parent report had 10.3% sensitivity (14/136) and 80.3% specificity (496/618) for detecting physiological nonadherence.
- Physiological adherence mediated ADHD symptom outcomes: significant effects were found for time × adherence (F₁,₄₆₈ = 12.2, p < .0005) and treatment × adherence (F₁,₄₆₈ = 5.73, p = .017), with nonadherence producing greater deleterious effects in medication-only (MedMgt) than in combined medication plus behavioral treatment (Comb). The triple interaction time × treatment × adherence was not significant.
Methods
- Secondary analysis of the NIMH MTA 14-month randomized trial. The present study focused on 289 children in MedMgt and Comb; 254 had one or more readable saliva assays, providing 748 usable assays (average 2.9 assays/participant, range 1–4).
- Saliva methylphenidate swabs were collected at 1, 3, 9, and 14 months without prenotification, after parent verbal report. Physiological adherence was defined by detectable MPH; subject-level adherence required >50% positive assays. Parent verbal adherence was obtained from monthly medication visits.
- Analyses included cross-tabulation of parent report versus saliva assay concordance and random-effects regression on parent- and teacher-rated SNAP-IV ADHD symptom scores, testing site, time, adherence, treatment, and interactions.
Limitations
- The paper states that saliva assays may miss MPH if the last dose was taken ≥8 hours earlier, that uncertainty remains about the detection window and appropriate threshold, and that findings apply only to the MTA sample (combined-type ADHD, ages 7–10) and principally immediate-release MPH t.i.d.; newer long-acting formulations may yield different adherence rates.
- The paper also notes possible parent overreporting due to social desirability, therapeutic expectations, and stigma, and that same-day assays cannot capture adherence between visits.
- Evident from the text: assays per child varied from 1 to 4, and the subject-level >50% threshold is a pragmatic binary classification rather than a continuous measure of adherence.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 52 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“just more than half of the subjects (n = 136 [53.5%]) were physiologically adherent on all of their available samples.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Physiological Adherence
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 136Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The MedMgt and Comb groups did not differ significantly in rates of physiological adherence.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Physiological Adherence
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When findings were grouped by children (rather than by records), 24.8% (n = 63) of 254 children's medication regimens were classified physiologically nonadherent (i.e., e50% of their saliva samples below detectable 3 ng/mL).”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Physiological Adherence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“across all children, 31 subjects (12.2%) were nonadherent on all collected saliva samples”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Physiological Adherence
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 31Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, applying the same definition for nonadherence to parental reports (e50%) as for physiological adherence, only 8 (3.1%) of the parents reported nonadherence.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Verbal (Parent-Reported) Medication Adherence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Overall, nearly one fourth (176 of 748 [23.5%]) of the saliva samples were physiologically nonadherent, below the detectable 3 ng/mL (indicating no MPH ingestion within 8 hours).”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Physiological Adherence
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“if we use parent verbal reports as a ''test'' to detect nonadherence against the physiological assay, the test has poor sensitivity, with only 14 of 136 physiological nonadherence cases (10.3%) identified by parental report.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Concordance Between Verbal and Physiological Adherence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“concordance in Table 3 between parental reports of compliance and physiological measures was only fair”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, unlike some previous studies, we found no associations between adherence and demographic factors such as age, sex, 17,22 family income, and single-parent status 1, 16,18,29,30”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Firestone, 1982, Factors associated with children's adherence to stimulant medication, Am J Orthopsychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [22] Swanson, 2003, Compliance with stimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: issues and approaches for improvement, CNS Drugs source
- Not checked yetcites [1] Cox, 2004, Impact of methylphenidate delivery profiles on driving performance of adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a pilot study, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [16] Hack, 2001, Pediatric psychotropic medication compliance: a literature review and research-based suggestions for improving treatment compliance, J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol source
- Not checked yetcites [18] Perwien, 2004, Stimulant treatment patterns and compliance in children and adults with newly treated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, J Manag Care Pharm source
- Not checked yetcites [29] Gau, 2006, Determinants of adherence to methylphenidate and the impact of poor adherence on maternal and family measures, J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol source
- Not checked yetcites [30] Rostain, 1993, Assessing parents' willingness to pursue treatment for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because our current findings, as well as previous reports, have shown that medication adherence is associated with children's outcomes”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 28
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Probably not a substantial claim. 19
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“two factors were differentially related to greater physiological medication adherence, ethnicity (more adherence in whites), and having a mother who was working outside of the home.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Physiological Adherence
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 228 (89.8%) of 254 parents reported their children as taking the study medication on all occasions”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Verbal (Parent-Reported) Medication Adherence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These findings demonstrated that ADHD symptoms decreased significantly over time and was mediated by physiological adherence (adherent subjects showed greater improvement over time).”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Random Regression Analyses of Adherence as a Mediator of Outcomes
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The significant effect of treatment  adherence suggests that the main effect of adherence on ADHD ratings was different in the Comb versus MedMgt groups, as seen in Figure 1, but the lack of a triple interaction (time  treatment  adherence) indicates that the MedMgt and Comb groups did not show a significant differential effect of adherence on the rates of improvement over time.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Random Regression Analyses of Adherence as a Mediator of Outcomes
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In contrast, we did find somewhat greater physiological nonadherence as a function of minority ethnic status, as well as among children whose mothers were not employed.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“concordance of parental reports of adherence with physiological measures was substantially better than chance, but actual agreement was only ''slight'' (i.e., 0's < 0.20), using the rating system of Landis and Koch, 28”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Concordance Between Verbal and Physiological Adherence
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Significant differences found for time (F 1,248 = 754.8,p < .0001),treatment  adherence (F 1,468 = 5.73, p = .017),and time  adherence (F 1,468 = 12.2, p < .0005).”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“poor treatment adherence and early termination can undermine the effectiveness of this treatment in real-world settings, producing suboptimal outcomes, 10Y12 a problem recognized even two decades ago.13”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 10Y12
- Not checked yetcites [13] Sleator, 1985, Measurement of compliance, Psychopharmacol Bull
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA), medication use mediated the degree of baseline to 14-month, and 14-to 24-month changes in ADHD symptom ratings, buttressing the initial 14-month randomized clinical trial findings 4,5,15 that the use of a carefully monitored t.i.d.schedule of stimulant medication (with or”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] MTA Cooperative Group, 1999, A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Multi-modal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD, Arch Gen Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [5] 1999, Moderators and mediators of treatment response for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Arch Gen Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [15] MTA Cooperative Group, 2004, National Institute of Mental Health Multi-modal Treatment Study of ADHD follow-up: 24-month outcomes of treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Pediatrics source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The protocol specified that four saliva assays would be conducted on each MTA medication-treated child during the course of the 14-month treatment period (at follow-up visits 2, 6, 9, and 14), with no prenotification given to families of whether saliva assays would be drawn during that particular visit.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Physiological Adherence
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the remaining 258 children (123 MedMgt and 135 Comb subjects), 254 had one or more readable saliva assays (32 saliva vials were broken in transit or otherwise not readable).”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Physiological Adherence
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 258Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“estimated adherence rates in children with ADHD only range from 56% to 75%, 16 and more than 50% of patients with ADHD discontinue treatment regardless of its efficacy or symptom severity.17,18”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Hack, 2001, Pediatric psychotropic medication compliance: a literature review and research-based suggestions for improving treatment compliance, J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol source
- Not checked yetcites [17] Firestone, 1982, Factors associated with children's adherence to stimulant medication, Am J Orthopsychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [18] Perwien, 2004, Stimulant treatment patterns and compliance in children and adults with newly treated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, J Manag Care Pharm source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The experimental interventions (MedMgt, Beh, and Comb) were delivered by MTA staff for 14 months and were carefully monitored for treatment fidelity.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Study Population
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“subjects in the medication management and combination groups started with a 28-day, double-blind, daily-switch titration of MPH hydrochloride, using 5 randomly ordered repeats each of placebo, 5, 10, and 15 or 20 mg, with the higher dose, 15 mg versus 20 mg, being determined on the basis of the child's weight (threshold Q26 kg).”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Study Design
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] MTA Cooperative Group, 1999, A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Multi-modal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD, Arch Gen Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [5] 1999, Moderators and mediators of treatment response for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Arch Gen Psychiatry source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“one study of children (N = 1,635; aged 3Y7 years) taking methylphenidate (MPH) immediate-release revealed that 54.0% of the subjects received only one prescription, and only 10.9% received five or more prescriptions during a 1-year period.19”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [19] Olfson, 2003, National trends in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Am J Psychiatry source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 1,635Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“recent national data concerning ADHD treatment suggest that such problems may be increasing, perhaps in part because of many youths receiving insufficient medication treatment visits.1,19Y21”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 1,19Y21
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, it is unlikely that such planned nonmedication days would account for all reported nonadherence.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Given the advantages of random-effects regression (RR) techniques over traditional analyses of variance for longitudinal clinical trials data, 4,11 we used RR for subsequent analyses”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Data Analyses
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] MTA Cooperative Group, 1999, A 14-month randomized clinical trial of treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Multi-modal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD, Arch Gen Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [11] MTA Cooperative Group, 2004, National Institute of Mental Health Multi-modal Treatment Study of ADHD follow-up: changes in effectiveness and growth after the end of treatment, Pediatrics source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The present study focuses on the 289 subjects in the medication-only and combined treatment groups, who were assigned to systematic, carefully titrated, 26 monitored, and adjusted medication.27”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Study Population
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Greenhill, 2001, Impairment and deportment responses to different methylphenidate doses in children with ADHD: the MTA Titration Trial, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [27] Vitiello, 2001, Methylphenidate dosage for children with ADHD over time under controlled conditions: lessons from the MTA, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The available 254 subjects (87.9%) provided a total of 780 assays (3.1 assays/participant; range 1Y4 assays, with 748 (2.9/ participant) usable assays.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Physiological Adherence
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 254Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Saliva swabs were gathered from the child only after the parent had verbally reported about the child's medication adherence.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Physiological Adherence
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Nonadherence has been linked to a variety of factors, ranging from proximal and practical aspects of medication administration and/or immediately recognized side effects to more distal factors, including family socioeconomic status and ethnicity.3,22,23”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Wolraich, 2001, Randomized, controlled trial of OROS methylphenidate once a day in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Pediatrics source
- Not checked yetcites [22] Swanson, 2003, Compliance with stimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: issues and approaches for improvement, CNS Drugs source
- Not checked yetcites [23] Marcus, 2005, Continuity of methyl-phenidate treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No significant differences were found between the two medication groups in medication participation, swab frequency, or study retention.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Physiological Adherence
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Another study found that only 74% of children with ADHD initially assigned to stimulants took 50% or more of their pills for 12 months, 20 and only 52% continued to use stimulant medication for 3 consecutive years.21”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [20] Corkum, 1999, Parental knowledge of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and opinions of treatment options: impact on enrollment and adherence to a 12-month treatment trial, Can J Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [21] Thiruchelvam, 2001, Moderators and mediators of long-term adherence to stimulant treatment in children with ADHD, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Stigma associated with medication therapy may also contribute to the discrepancy between self-report and biological measures of adherence.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The saliva assays used in the study fairly represent whether the child took medication on the day parents reported compliance.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Same-day saliva methylphenidate assays suggest that nearly half of the parents are inaccurate informants of their child's ADHD medication adherence and that parents may overestimate actual (physiological) adherence.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“one study of youths' adherence to human immunodeficiency virus therapy found that many participants viewed their health care providers as powerful authorities and admitted to giving them inaccurate adherence information to avoid blame and criticism.37”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] Rao, 2007, Stigma and social barriers to medication adherence with urban youth living with HIV, AIDS Care source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“our results of verbal adherence (89.8% across all visits) are higher than generally seen in longitudinal studies, 16Y21 likely because of the intensive follow-up procedures put in place to facilitate adherence during 14 months.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites 16Y21
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The current literature on ethnic disparities in adherence is somewhat inconsistent: some studies indicate that minority youths are at increased risk for premature treatment discontinuation and lower use of psychiatric services and medication, 23,31 but other studies suggest no ethnic disparities in mental health prescription rates, referrals, and counseling once a diagnosis is made.32,33”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [23] Marcus, 2005, Continuity of methyl-phenidate treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med source
- Not checked yetcites [31] Leslie, 2003, Racial/ethnic differences in the use of psychotropic medication in high-risk children and adolescents, J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
- Not checked yetcites [32] Zito, 1999, Psychotherapeutic medication patterns for youths with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med source
- Not checked yetcites [33] Kelleher, 1999, Patient race and ethnicity in primary care management of child behavior problems: a report from PROS and ASPN, Med Care source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Short-acting formulations have been mostly replaced by newer longer-acting profiles, so the adherence/ compliance rates for newer formulations may differ from those reported here.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“our conclusions should be tempered by the uncertainty about how long saliva values are detectable (Q3 ng/mL) on chromatographic analysis and whether that constitutes an appropriate threshold for adherence.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Caution is also warranted, to the extent that our results apply only to the MTA sample (combined type ADHD, age 7Y10 years) and medication regimen, principally based on immediate-release MPH t.i.d.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the present discrepancy between parental reports and saliva levels may have resulted from both intentional (purposeful actions) and unintentional (patterned behaviors, such as forgetting) variables.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Horne, 2001, Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial. Do hypertensive patients' beliefs about their illness and treatment influence medication adherence and quality of life?, J Hum Hypertens source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The saliva assays used in the study fairly represent whether the child took medication on the day parents reported compliance.
In the paper
“Recent literature has similarly demonstrated the impact of the therapeutic relation on adherence reports and behaviors, suggesting that a more positive parentYtherapist relationship predicts greater treatment acceptability and persistence.38”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [38] Kazdin, 2005, The therapeutic alliance in cognitive-behavioral treatment of children referred for oppositional, aggressive, and antisocial behavior, J Consult Clin Psychol source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Previous research indicates that inaccurate information about treatment, embarrassment, and anticipated disapproval from family and peers can lead patients or parents to skip medication doses or prematurely discontinue treatment.37,39”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The meaning of this finding is unclear and may result from the different types of subjects who participate in longterm treatment studies versus those drawn from more naturalistic service use databases and short-term studies.”
§ Medication Adherence in the MTA: Saliva Methylphenidate Samples Versus Parent Report and Mediating Effect of Concomitant Behavioral Treatment > DISCUSSION
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
The saliva assays used in the study fairly represent whether the child took medication on the day parents reported compliance.
“To the extent that our saliva assays were a fair representation of the child's having taken medication on the day that parents reported compliance”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, it appears that 50% of patients with ADHD discontinue treatment regardless of its efficacy or symptom severity [20].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Specificity is calculated using the wrong denominator
MinorWith parental reports of nonadherence treated as a positive test, Table 3 shows 496 true negatives among 505 physiologically adherent assays. Specificity is therefore 98.2%; 496/618 instead measures the proportion of parental adherence reports that matched the assay.
Reported 80.3 · recomputed 98.217822
“Negative test results (i.e., the parent reports adherence) has a specificity of 80.3% (496/618)”
Percentage for four children is incorrect
MinorFour of 254 children is 1.6%, not 1.2%.
Reported 1.2 · recomputed 1.574803
“4 children (1.2%) were reported as taking their medications three fourths of the time”
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
(1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.12.1073 · Cited by 3,372
(1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.12.1088 · Cited by 652
MTA Cooperative Group (2004) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.113.4.754 · Cited by 589
Treatment of ADHD in children with tics: A randomized controlled trial
The Tourette’s Syndrome Study Group (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.58.4.527 · Cited by 504
Wolraich, M. L., Greenhill, L. L., Pelham, W., Swanson, J., Wilens, T., Palumbo, D., Atkins, M., McBurnett, K., Bukstein, O., August, G., et al. (2001) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.108.4.883 · Cited by 502
Self-citationJensen, P. N., Arnold, L. E., Richters, J., Severe, J. B., Vereen, D. R., Vitiello, B., Schiller, E., Hinshaw, S. P., Elliott, G. R., Conners, C., et al. (1999) · Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) · Cited by 432
Self-citationNational trends in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Olfson, M., Gameroff, M. J., Marcus, S. C., & Jensen, P. S. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1071 · Cited by 394
Self-citationStigma and social barriers to medication adherence with urban youth living with HIV
Rao, D., Kekwaletswe, T. C., Hosek, S., Martinez, J., & Rodriguez, F. (2007) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540120600652303 · Cited by 391
MTA Cooperative Group (2004) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.113.4.762 · Cited by 384
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–112 of 112
Medication Adherence in ADHD Needs Attention
Geller, B. (2009) · Journal watch · doi:10.1056/jp200906220000002
Eizaguirre, M. Á. V., Aróstegui, J. A. I., & de Salud, S. N. (2014)
Pharmacotherapy of Disruptive and Impulse Control Disorders
Reeves, G. M., Wehring, H. J., & Riddle, M. A. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119092254.ch25 · Cited by 47
Emilsson, M. (2017) · Linköping University medical dissertations · doi:10.3384/diss.diva-142757
“Self-reports assessing adherence are shown to generate higher adherence prevalence than objective measurements such as physiological assays (Pappadopulos et al., 2009).”
BackgroundThe cost-effectiveness of treatments for pediatric ADHD: the effects of gender and comorbidity
Leinwand, B. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/mh1z-bn33
(2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444328172.refs
(2021) · American Academy of PediatricsItasca, IL eBooks · doi:10.1542/9781610025478-4
Hung, K.-C., Cheng, C.-M., Liang, S.-C., Sun, C., Chen, C.-M., Cheng, Y., & Chiu, H. (2023) · doi:10.2196/preprints.53381
(2024) · American Academy of PediatricsItasca, IL eBooks · doi:10.1542/9781610027663-ch4
(2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118941430.refs
Cabelguen, C., Challet‐Bouju, G., Thiabaud, E., Donnio, Y., Lefebvre, L., Hardouin, J.-B., & Grall‐Bronnec, M. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-111698
“11 16 Furthermore, the moderate efficacy of treatment may, in part, be explained by poor adherence, 17 as well as the long-term nature of the prescription.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Pappadopulos, E., Jensen, P. S., Chait, A. R., Arnold, L. E., Swanson, J. M., Greenhill, L. L., Hechtman, L., Chuang, S., Wells, K. C., Pelham, W., Cooper, T., Elliott, G., & Newcorn, J. H.
- Affiliations
- Realistic Education in Action Coalition to Foster Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jensen, Peter S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 501-510
- ISSN
- 0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129144665
- Semantic Scholar
- 1af07e1468f22d0d0b85f547c03c395ca309d959
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- U.S. Department of Justice
- U.S. Department of Education
- Ohio State University
- University of Pittsburgh (U01 MH50467, N01MH 12010)
- McGill University (N01MH12008)
- York University
- National Institutes of Health (n01mh12011-0-0-1, n01mh012009-007, n01mh12008-0-0-1, n01mh12010-0-0-1, n01mh12004-0-0-0, n01mh12007-0-0-0, n01mh012012-001)
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- School of Medicine, New York University
- Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh
- University of California, Irvine (N01MH 12004)
- National Institute of Mental Health (N01MH 12011, U01MH50461, N01 MH12007, N01MH-12012, U01MH50440, N01MH12008,, U01MH050467, MH-50467, U01 MH50477, U01MH050440, N01 MH12009, U01MH050453, U01MH50467, U01MH050461, N01MH 12004, U01MH50453, N01MH 12010, 12010)
- National Institute of Nursing Research
- Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- medication adherence, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, methylphenidate, multimodal therapy
- MeSH terms
- Assessment of Medication Adherence, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Behavior Therapy, Behavioral Symptoms, Child, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Parents, Regression Analysis, Saliva, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Drug Monitoring, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-08, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-08 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review