The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sorting Through Subsets: Which T-Cell Populations Mediate Highly Effective Adoptive Immunotherapy?
Open accessAbstract
CD8(+) T cells have been described as being naive or one of 4 antigen (Ag)-experienced subtypes representing a continuum of differentiation and maturation: T memory stem cell, central memory T cell, effector memory T cell, and terminally differentiated effector T cells. In mice, adoptive cell transfer of less-differentiated naive T cells, T memory stem cell, and central memory T cell subsets have consistently demonstrated superior in vivo expansion, persistence, and antitumor capacities relative to the more differentiated effector memory T cell and effector T cell subsets. Retrospective analyses from human adoptive cell transfer trials have confirmed that transfer of less-differentiated T-cell subsets is highly correlated with objective clinical responses. These findings, combined with the recent ability to convey de novo Ag reactivity with high efficiency through genetic engineering of exogenous T-cell or chimeric Ag receptors, now challenge the field with 3 important questions: (1) how should less-differentiated T-cell subsets be isolated for human clinical trials?; (2) what is the best means of expanding T cells ex vivo in such a way as to not corrupt the beneficial traits of the younger subsets?; and (3) is it necessary to physically separate younger subsets from their more differentiated counterparts? Answering these questions will allow for the rational development of the next generation of highly effective and potentially curative T-cell therapies for the treatment of cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions
Sallusto, F., Lenig, D., Förster, R., Lipp, M., & Lanzavecchia, A. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44385 · Cited by 5,846
Sipuleucel-T Immunotherapy for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Kantoff, P. W., Higano, C. S., Shore, N. D., Berger, E. R., Small, E. J., Penson, D. F., Redfern, C. H., Ferrari, A. C., Dreicer, R., Sims, R. B., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1001294 · Cited by 5,572
Rosenberg, S. A., Packard, B. S., Aebersold, P. M., Solomon, D., Topalian, S. L., Toy, S. T., Simon, P., Lotze, M. T., Yang, J. C., Seipp, C. A., et al. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198812223192527 · Cited by 2,389
A human memory T cell subset with stem cell–like properties
Gattinoni, L., Lugli, E., Ji, Y., Pos, Z., Paulos, C. M., Quigley, M. F., Almeida, J. R., Gostick, E., Yu, Z., Carpenito, C., et al. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2446 · Cited by 1,974
Self-citationLineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets
Wherry, E. J., Teichgräber, V., Becker, T. C., Masopust, D., Kaech, S. M., Antia, R., von Andrian, U. H., & Ahmed, R. (2003) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni889 · Cited by 1,864
Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response
Restifo, N. P., Dudley, M. E., & Rosenberg, S. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3191 · Cited by 1,688
Self-citationControl of Effector CD8 + T Cell Function by the Transcription Factor Eomesodermin
Pearce, E. L., Mullen, A. C., Martins, G. A., Krawczyk, C. M., Hutchins, A. S., Zediak, V. P., Banica, M., DiCioccio, C. B., Gross, D. A., Mao, C.-A., et al. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1090148 · Cited by 1,014
Rao, R. R., Li, Q., Odunsi, K., & Shrikant, P. A. (2010) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2009.10.010 · Cited by 656
Metabolic switching and fuel choice during T‐cell differentiation and memory development
van der Windt, G. J. W., & Pearce, E. L. (2012) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1600-065x.2012.01150.x · Cited by 563
Migratory properties of naive, effector, and memory CD8(+) T cells
Weninger, W., Crowley, M. A., Manjunath, N., & von Andrian, U. H. (2001) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.194.7.953 · Cited by 515
Cited by
The Cancer Stem Cell Niche: How Essential Is the Niche in Regulating Stemness of Tumor Cells?
Plaks, V., Kong, N., & Werb, Z. (2015) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.015 · Cited by 1,557
Dendritic-Cell-Based Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines
Palucka, K., & Banchereau, J. (2013) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2013.07.004 · Cited by 869
Metabolic Regulation of T Cell Longevity and Function in Tumor Immunotherapy
Kishton, R. J., Sukumar, M., & Restifo, N. P. (2017) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.06.016 · Cited by 548
Self-citationCAR T Cell Therapy for Solid Tumors: Bright Future or Dark Reality?
Wagner, J., Wickman, E., DeRenzo, C., & Gottschalk, S. (2020) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.09.015 · Cited by 380
From “truly naïve” to “exhausted senescent” T cells: When markers predict functionality
Larbi, A., & Fulop, T. (2014) · Cytometry Part A · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.22351 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Klebanoff, C. A., Gattinoni, L., & Restifo, N. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Immunotherapy
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 651-660
- ISSN
- 1524-9557 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091246599
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 7.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sorting Through Subsets: Which T-Cell Populations Mediate Highly Effective Adoptive Immunotherapy? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/cji.0b013e31827806e6
- The paper
- Klebanoff, C. A., Gattinoni, L., & Restifo, N. P. (2012). Sorting Through Subsets: Which T-Cell Populations Mediate Highly Effective Adoptive Immunotherapy? Journal of Immunotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1097/cji.0b013e31827806e6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
