Cited by 437Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

An evidence-based approach to establish the functional and clinical significance of copy number variants in intellectual and developmental disabilities

Open access
Kaminsky, Erin B, Kaul, Vineith, Paschall, Justin, Church, Deanna M, Bunke, Brian, Kunig, Dawn, Moreno-De-Luca, Daniel, Moreno-De-Luca, Andres +26 more·2011·Genetics in Medicine

Abstract

Purpose Copy number variants have emerged as a major cause of human disease such as autism and intellectual disabilities. Because copy number variants are common in normal individuals, determining the functional and clinical significance of rare copy number variants in patients remains challenging. The adoption of whole-genome chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-tier diagnostic test for individuals with unexplained developmental disabilities provides a unique opportunity to obtain large copy number variant datasets generated through routine patient care. Methods A consortium of diagnostic laboratories was established (the International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays consortium) to share copy number variant and phenotypic data in a central, public database. We present the largest copy number variant case-control study to date comprising 15,749 International Standards for Cytogenomic Arrays cases and 10,118 published controls, focusing our initial analysis on recurrent deletions and duplications involving 14 copy number variant regions. Results Compared with controls, 14 deletions and seven duplications were significantly overrepresented in cases, providing a clinical diagnosis as pathogenic. Conclusion Given the rapid expansion of clinical chromosomal microarray analysis testing, very large datasets will be available to determine the functional significance of increasingly rare copy number variants. This data will provide an evidence-based guide to clinicians across many disciplines involved in the diagnosis, management, and care of these patients and their families.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/gim.0b013e31822c79f9

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An extended search in CNV databases revealed a single individual with heterozygous 1.1Mb deletion with isolated Arnold-Chiari malformation.

    “An extended search in copy number variation (CNV) databases regarding human phenotypes associated with CNVs involving the MIR140 gene revealed a single individual with heterozygous 1.1Mb deletion with isolated Arnold-Chiari malformation41.”

    From Gain-of-function mutation of microRNA-140 in human skeletal dysplasia (2019) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Results section (CNV Characterization; page unavailable) describes aggregate CNV findings, not an individual with the claimed phenotype. Searches of our copy for MIR140, a 1.1 Mb deletion, and Arnold-Chiari malformation found no passage addressing the claimed case. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. [1]Iafrate AJ Feuk L Rivera MN Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome Nat Genet 2004 36 949 951 15286789
  2. [2]IHGSC Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome Nature 2004 431 931 945 15496913
  3. [3]Church DM Lappalainen I Sneddon TP Public data archives for genomic structural variation Nat Genet 2010 42 813 814 20877315 PMC3169170
  4. [4]Boyle CA Boulet S Schieve LA Trends in the Prevalence of Developmental Disabilities in US Children, 1997–2008 Pediatrics 2011 127 1034 1042 21606152
  5. [5]Miller DT Adam MP Aradhya S Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies Am J Hum Genet 2010 86 749 764 20466091 PMC2869000
  6. [6]Manning M Hudgins L Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities Genet Med 2010 12 742 745 20962661 PMC3111046
  7. [7]Baldwin EL Lee JY Blake DM Enhanced detection of clinically relevant genomic imbalances using a targeted plus whole genome oligonucleotide microarray Genet Med 2008 10 415 429 18496225
  8. [9]Sharp AJ Hansen S Selzer RR Discovery of previously unidentified genomic disorders from the duplication architecture of the human genome Nat Genet 2006 38 1038 1042 16906162
  9. [11]Brunet A Armengol L Heine D BAC array CGH in patients with Velocardiofacial syndrome-like features reveals genomic aberrations on chromosome region 1q21. 1 BMC Med Genet 2009 10 144 20030804 PMC2805625
  10. [14]Willatt L Cox J Barber J 3q29 microdeletion syndrome: clinical and molecular characterization of a new syndrome Am J Hum Genet 2005 77 154 160 15918153 PMC1226188
  11. [15]Ballif BC Theisen A Coppinger J Expanding the clinical phenotype of the 3q29 microdeletion syndrome and characterization of the reciprocal microduplication Mol Cytogenet 2008 1 8 18471269 PMC2408925
  12. [16]Kurotaki N Harada N Shimokawa O Fifty microdeletions among 112 cases of Sotos syndrome: low copy repeats possibly mediate the common deletion Hum Mutat 2003 22 378 387 14517949
  13. [17]Franco LM de Ravel T Graham BH A syndrome of short stature, microcephaly and speech delay is associated with duplications reciprocal to the common Sotos syndrome deletion Eur J Hum Genet 2010 18 258 261 19844260 PMC2987195
  14. [18]Bayes M Magano LF Rivera N Flores R Perez Jurado LA Mutational mechanisms of Williams-Beuren syndrome deletions Am J Hum Genet 2003 73 131 151 12796854 PMC1180575
  15. [19]Somerville MJ Mervis CB Young EJ Severe expressive-language delay related to duplication of the Williams-Beuren locus N Engl J Med 2005 353 1694 1701 16236740 PMC2893213
  16. [20]Devriendt K Matthijs G Van Dael R Delineation of the critical deletion region for congenital heart defects, on chromosome 8p23. 1 Am J Hum Genet 1999 64 1119 1126 10090897 PMC1377836
  17. [21]Barber JC Bunyan D Curtis M 8p23. 1 duplication syndrome differentiated from copy number variation of the defensin cluster at prenatal diagnosis in four new families Mol Cytogenet 2010 3 3 20167067 PMC2846957
  18. [22]Kuwano A Mutirangura A Dittrich B Molecular dissection of the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome region (15q11–13) by YAC cloning and FISH analysis Hum Mol Genet 1992 1 417 425 1363801
  19. [23]Cook EH Jr Lindgren V Leventhal BL Autism or atypical autism in maternally but not paternally derived proximal 15q duplication Am J Hum Genet 1997 60 928 934 9106540 PMC1712464
  20. [26]Miller DT Shen Y Weiss LA Microdeletion/duplication at 15q13.2q13. 3 among individuals with features of autism and other neuropsychiatric disorders J Med Genet 2009 46 242 248 18805830 PMC4090085
  21. [27]Ullmann R Turner G Kirchhoff M Array CGH identifies reciprocal 16p13. 1 duplications and deletions that predispose to autism and/or mental retardation Hum Mutat 2007 28 674 682 17480035
  22. [28]Hannes FD Sharp AJ Mefford HC Recurrent reciprocal deletions and duplications of 16p13. 11: the deletion is a risk factor for MR/MCA while the duplication may be a rare benign variant J Med Genet 2009 46 223 232 18550696 PMC2658752
  23. [29]Kumar RA KaraMohamed S Sudi J Recurrent 16p11.2 microdeletions in autism Hum Mol Genet 2008 17 628 638 18156158
  24. [30]Weiss LA Shen Y Korn JM Association between Microdeletion and Microduplication at 16p11. 2 and Autism N Engl J Med 2008 358 667 675 18184952
  25. [32]Smith AC McGavran L Robinson J Interstitial deletion of (17)(p11.2p11. 2) in nine patients Am J Med Genet 1986 24 393 414 2425619
  26. [33]Potocki L Chen KS Park SS Molecular mechanism for duplication 17p11. 2- the homologous recombination reciprocal of the Smith-Magenis microdeletion Nat Genet 2000 24 84 87 10615134
  27. [34]Mefford HC Clauin S Sharp AJ Recurrent reciprocal genomic rearrangements of 17q12 are associated with renal disease, diabetes, and epilepsy Am J Hum Genet 2007 81 1057 1069 17924346 PMC2265663
  28. [35]Nagamani SC Erez A Shen J Clinical spectrum associated with recurrent genomic rearrangements in chromosome 17q12 Eur J Hum Genet 2010 18 278 284 19844256 PMC2987224
  29. [37]Koolen DA Vissers LE Pfundt R A new chromosome 17q21. 31 microdeletion syndrome associated with a common inversion polymorphism Nat Genet 2006 38 999 1001 16906164
  30. [38]Shaw-Smith C Pittman AM Willatt L Microdeletion encompassing MAPT at chromosome 17q21. 3 is associated with developmental delay and learning disability Nat Genet 2006 38 1032 1037 16906163
  31. [39]Grisart B Willatt L Destree A 17q21. 31 microduplication patients are characterised by behavioural problems and poor social interaction J Med Genet 2009 46 524 530 19502243
  32. [40]Desmaze C Scambler P Prieur M Routine diagnosis of DiGeorge syndrome by fluorescent in situ hybridization Hum Genet 1993 90 663 665 8444474
  33. [41]Ou Z Berg JS Yonath H Microduplications of 22q11. 2 are frequently inherited and are associated with variable phenotypes Genet Med 2008 10 267 277 18414210
  34. [42]Pujana MA Nadal M Guitart M Armengol L Gratacos M Estivill X Human chromosome 15q11-q14 regions of rearrangements contain clusters of LCR15 duplicons Eur J Hum Genet 2002 10 26 35 11896453
  35. [43]Emanuel BS Molecular mechanisms and diagnosis of chromosome 22q11. 2 rearrangements Dev Disabil Res Rev 2008 14 11 18 18636632 PMC2810965
  36. [44]Consortium IS Rare chromosomal deletions and duplications increase risk of schizophrenia Nature 2008 455 237 241 18668038 PMC3912847
  37. [46]Shaikh TH Gai X Perin JC High-resolution mapping and analysis of copy number variations in the human genome: A data resource for clinical and research applications Genome Res 2009 19 1682 1690 19592680 PMC2752118
  38. [47]Shi J Levinson DF Duan J Common variants on chromosome 6p22. 1 are associated with schizophrenia Nature 2009 460 753 757 19571809 PMC2775422
  39. [48]Mefford HC Eichler EE Duplication hotspots, rare genomic disorders, and common disease Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009 19 196 204 19477115 PMC2746670
  40. [50]Rajcan-Separovic E Harvard C Liu X Clinical and molecular cytogenetic characterisation of a newly recognised microdeletion syndrome involving 2p15–16. 1 J Med Genet 2007 44 269 276 16963482 PMC2598046
  41. [51]Willemsen MH Fernandez BA Bacino CA Identification of ANKRD11 and ZNF778 as candidate genes for autism and variable cognitive impairment in the novel 16q24. 3 microdeletion syndrome Eur J Hum Genet 2010 18 429 435 19920853 PMC2987261
  42. [52]Bruno DL Anderlid BM Lindstrand A Further molecular and clinical delineation of co-locating 17p13. 3 microdeletions and microduplications that show distinctive phenotypes J Med Genet 2010 47 299 311 20452996
  43. [53]Tsuchiya KD Shaffer LG Aradhya S Variability in interpreting and reporting copy number changes detected by array-based technology in clinical laboratories Genet Med 2009 11 866 873 19904209

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaminsky, E. B., Kaul, V., Paschall, J., Church, D. M., Bunke, B., Kunig, D., Moreno-De-Luca, D., Moreno-De-Luca, A., Mulle, J. G., Warren, S. T., Richard, G., Compton, J. G., Fuller, A. E., Gliem, T. J., Huang, S., Collinson, M. N., Beal, S. J., Ackley, T., Pickering, D. L., Golden, D. M., Aston, E., Whitby, H., Shetty, S., Rossi, M. R., Rudd, M. K., South, S. T., Brothman, A. R., Sanger, W. G., Iyer, R. K., Crolla, J. A., Thorland, E. C., Aradhya, S., Ledbetter, D. H., & Martin, C. L.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • National Center for Biotechnology Information (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Salisbury District Hospital (GB)
  • Michigan Medicine (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ledbetter, David H
  • Martin, Christa L
Venue
Genetics in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
777-784
ISSN
1098-3600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110105653
Cited by
437
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 38
FWCI
22.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetics in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH080129, R01MH092902, MH074090, R01MH080129, R01MH083722, MH083722, R01MH074090)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD064525, RC2HD064525)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
copy number variation, intellectual disability, developmental disabilities, chromosomal microarray analysis, recurrent deletions, duplication, pathogenicity, case-control study, phenotypic data, public databases, autism spectrum disorder
MeSH terms
Developmental Disabilities, Humans, Intellectual Disability, Genome, Human, Gene Dosage, Evidence-Based Medicine, Cytogenetic Analysis, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review