Cited by 80Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Factor Structure in Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation

Randall, Diane, Thomas, Matt, Whiting, Diane, McGrath, Andrew·2017·Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective: To confirm the construct validity of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) by investigating the fit of published factor structures in a sample of adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (posttraumatic amnesia > 24 hours). Participants: Archival data from 504 patient records at the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit at Liverpool Hospital, Australia. Participants were aged between 16 and 71 years and were engaged in a specialist rehabilitation program. Main Measure: The DASS-21. Results: Two of the 6 models had adequate fit using structural equation modeling. The data best fit Henry and Crawford's quadripartite model, which comprised a Depression, Anxiety and Stress factor, as well as a General Distress factor. The data also adequately fit Lovibond and Lovibond's original 3-factor model, and the internal consistencies of each factor were very good (α = 0.82–0.90). Conclusion: This study confirms the structure and construct validity of the DASS-21 and provides support for its use as a screening tool in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/htr.0000000000000250

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Randall, D., Thomas, M., Whiting, D., & McGrath, A.
Affiliations
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Published
2017-03
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
134-144
ISSN
0885-9701 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2495311191
Cited by
80
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
DASS, DASS-21, traumatic brain injury, factor structure, construct validity, post-traumatic depression, post-traumatic stress, general distress, brain injury rehabilitation, screening tool
MeSH terms
Neurological Rehabilitation, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Anxiety, Australia, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Retrospective Studies, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review