Cited by 63Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

A meta-analysis: Internet mindfulness-based interventions for stress management in the general population

Open access
Zhang, Yun, Xue, Jiaming, Huang, Ying·2020·Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychological stress was an important mental health problem among the general population and warrant research to inform strategies for effective prevention. iMBIs provide a possibility to offer easily accessible, efficacious, convenient, and low-cost interventions on a wide scale. However, the efficacy of iMBIs in the general population remains unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effects of iMBIs for stress reduction in the general population. METHODS: A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Data databases was performed up to April 10, 2019. The overall effect sizes of the iMBIs on stress, depression, anxiety, and mindfulness were recorded by the metric of Hedges' g with 95% confidence interval (CI), Z-value, and P value. RESULTS: Sixteen eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall results indicated that iMBIs had small to moderate effects on stress (Hedges' g = -0.393) and mindfulness (Hedges' g = -0.316) compared with the control group. Results from subgroup analyses revealed that the type of sample and delivery mode had a greater impact on heterogeneity across the studies. Meta-regression found that the overall effect might be moderated by guidance for iMBIs. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis suggested that iMBIs had small to moderate effects in reducing stress and improving mindfulness of the general population in comparison with the control group. Future research is needed to explore how iMBIs are remolded to improve adherence and suit specific individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/md.0000000000020493

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analyses found small to moderate effects on stress of an eight-week online instructor-led mindfulness course.

    “Meta-analyses have examined the effects of web-based mindfulness training [24,28,29]. They all found small to moderate effects on stress of an eight-week online instructor led mindfulness course.”

    From The Effectiveness of a Four-Week Online Mindfulness Training Course on Individual Mindfulness Skills and Personal Perception of Stress in Company Employees Working from Home (2022) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results (Effects on stress and mindfulness; page unavailable) report a small-to-moderate reduction in stress from internet mindfulness-based interventions. But the Results (Characteristics of included studies and quality appraisal; page unavailable) say the interventions lasted 2–12 weeks and used several delivery modes; the pooled effect is not specifically for an eight-week, instructor-led course. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Online MBIs have a significant low-to-moderate impact on mental health, and these effects are maintained at short-term follow-up.

    “Our findings are largely in line with those reported in previous meta-analyses [9,10,28-30] and suggest that online MBIs have a significant low-to-moderate impact on mental health and that these effects are maintained at short-term follow-up.”

    From New evidence in the booming field of online mindfulness: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2021) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results sections on stress, mindfulness, depression, and anxiety report significant small-to-moderate effects of online MBIs in the general population. The Results section on study characteristics says ten studies reported follow-up data, but the paper does not report that the effects were maintained at short-term follow-up. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other studies revealed that online mindfulness trainings had a small to moderate effect on stress and mindfulness in the general population.

    “However, other studies revealed that online mindfulness trainings had a small to moderate effect on stress and mindfulness in the general population [28,29].”
  • A comprehensive review of online mindfulness-based interventions is still lacking.

    “As these reviews address a narrower target population [29] and scope of interventions [30] than our original meta-analysis, a comprehensive review of online MBIs is still lacking.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [15]Hedges LV Olkin I Statistical methods for meta-analysis. N Direct Progr Eval 1985; 1984: 25– 42.
  2. [16]Rosenthal RJER Meta-analytic procedures for social science research sage publications: Beverly hills, 1984, 148 pp. Educ Res 1986; 15: 18– 20.
  3. [41]Rainie L Zickuhr K Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Res Center 2015; 26: 948– 58.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Xue, J., & Huang, Y.
Affiliations
  • West China Medical Center of Sichuan University (CN)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, Ying
Venue
Medicine
Published
2020-07-10
Volume
99
Issue
28
Pages
e20493
ISSN
  • 0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-5964
OpenAlex
W3042197957
Cited by
63
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
stress reduction, psychological stress, general population, mindfulness, depression, anxiety, intervention delivery mode, stress management
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Internet, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review