Cited by 249Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchAutophagy in Disease and TherapyHereditary Neurological Disorders

Autophagy in Spinal Cord Motor Neurons in Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Sasaki, Shoichi·2011·Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology

Abstract

To assess the potential role of autophagy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), lumbar spinal cords in a total of 19 sporadic ALS cases and 27 age-matched controls were investigated. Immunohistochemical analysis using antibodies to the markers of autophagy microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3) and p62 was performed on samples from 12 ALS and 15 controls. Electron microscopy was performed on samples from 16 ALS and 15 controls, including overlapping cases. In the ALS cases, the somata of normal-appearing and degenerated motor neurons and round bodies were occasionally immunostained for LC3; round bodies and skein-like inclusions were immunostained for p62. By electron microscopy, all 16 ALS patients showed features of autophagy in the cytoplasm of normal-appearing motor neurons and, more frequently, in degenerated motor neurons. Autophagosomes surrounded by a double-membrane and autolysosomes isolated by a single membrane contained sequestered cytoplasmic organelles, such as mitochondria and ribosome-like structures. These autophagy features were also found in close association with the characteristic inclusions of ALS(i.e. round bodies, skein-like inclusions, and Bunina bodies); honeycomb-like structures also occasionally showed autophagy-associated features. Normal-appearing anterior horn neurons in control patients showed no autophagy features. Thus, autophagy seems to be activated and upregulated in the cytoplasm of motor neurons and may be involved in the mechanisms of neurodegeneration of motor neurons in sporadic ALS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nen.0b013e3182160690

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sasaki, S.
Affiliations
Tokyo Women's Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Sasaki, Shoichi
Venue
Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
Published
2011-05
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
349-359
ISSN
  • 0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6578
OpenAlex
W2317545246
Cited by
249
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
Keywords
autophagy, sporadic ALS, motor neurons, spinal cord, LC3, p62, autophagosomes, autolysosomes, round bodies, Bunina bodies, honeycomb structure, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Autophagy, Inclusion Bodies, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Lumbar Vertebrae, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Middle Aged, Motor Neurons, Nerve Degeneration, Spinal Cord, Lewy Bodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review