Cited by 36Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Nonverbal Communication of Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder During Clinical Interviews: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study Using Intranasal Oxytocin

Brüne, Martin, Kolb, Meike, Ebert, Andreas, Roser, Patrik, Edel, Marc-Andreas·2015·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

Interpersonal dysfunction is central to borderline personality disorder (BPD). Recent research has focused on the role of oxytocin (OT) in BPD, with mixed results regarding the processing of social information. Fifteen BPD patients and 15 controls participated in two clinical interviews, one under OT and one under placebo, which were randomly conducted 1 week apart in a double-blind fashion. Nonverbal behavior was evaluated using the Ethological Coding System for Interviews. Childhood trauma was examined using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. The patients with BPD showed less affiliative behavior than the controls. Notably, the controls, but not the patients, displayed more affiliation when OT was given at T1 compared with OT given at T2. OT was also associated with less flight behavior in both groups when given at T1 compared with placebo. OT responses were unrelated to the patients' history of childhood trauma. The present findings are informative with respect to patients' nonverbal prosocial behavior in clinical settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0000000000000240

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent work found that intranasal oxytocin did not improve anxiety or affiliative behaviour during therapy or clinical interview.

    “This interpretation is in line with findings from recent work investigating the effectiveness of intranasal oxytocin as a treatment enhancer in depression and BPD, which found that intranasal oxytocin did not improve anxiety or affiliative behaviour during therapy or clinical interview (Brune et al., 2015;MacDonald et al., 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brüne, M., Kolb, M., Ebert, A., Roser, P., & Edel, M.-A.
Affiliations
LWL-Universitätsklinikum Bochum (DE)
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2015-02
Volume
203
Issue
2
Pages
107-111
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031497674
Cited by
35
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, nonverbal communication, oxytocin, affiliative behavior, flight behavior, interpersonal problems, prosocial behavior, clinical interview, childhood trauma, social information processing
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Nonverbal Communication, Oxytocin, Placebos, Social Behavior, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review