Cited by 147Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Effects of intranasal oxytocin on 'compassion focused imagery'

Open access
Rockliff, Helen, Karl, Anke, McEwan, Kirsten, Gilbert, Jean, Matos, Marcela, Gilbert, Paul·2011·Emotion

Abstract

This study explored the effects of oxytocin on Compassion Focused Imagery (CFI), that is, imagining another "mind" being deeply compassionate to oneself, and the interaction of these effects with self-criticism and feeling socially safe with others. Forty-four healthy participants (29 men and 15 women) completed self-report measures of self-criticism, attachment style, and social safeness before taking part in a double-blind randomized placebo controlled study. They attended two imagery sessions, receiving oxytocin in one and a placebo in the other. Positive affect was measured before and after each imagery session, and "imagery experience" was assessed after each session. Overall, oxytocin increased the ease of imagining compassionate qualities but there were important individual differences in how CFI was experienced. Participants higher in self-criticism, lower in self-reassurance, social safeness, and attachment security had less positive experiences of CFI under oxytocin than placebo, indicating that the effects of oxytocin on affiliation may depend on attachment and self-evaluative styles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0023861

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exogenous oxytocin increased compassion-focused imagery only in individuals with higher attachment security.

    “another found that it increased compassion-focused imagery but only in individuals with higher attachment security (Rockliff et al., 2011).”

    From The evolved nest, oxytocin functioning, and prosocial development (2023) · cites this paper as Rockliff et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rockliff, H., Karl, A., McEwan, K., Gilbert, J., Matos, M., & Gilbert, P.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2011-12
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
1388-1396
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2159826578
Cited by
147
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Compassionate Mind Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
oxytocin, self-criticism, social safeness, attachment security, self-reassurance, positive affect, individual differences, affiliation, placebo effect
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Affect, Double-Blind Method, Empathy, Female, Humans, Imagination, Individuality, Male, Object Attachment, Oxytocin, Self Concept, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review