Cited by 23Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Is the Detection of Endometrial Nerve Fibers Useful in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis?

Leslie, Connull, Ma, Tony, McElhinney, Bernadette, Leake, Robyn, Stewart, Colin J.R.·2013·International Journal of Gynecological Pathology

Abstract

Laparoscopy is currently considered to be the gold standard investigation in patients suspected to have endometriosis, but this is an invasive and relatively costly procedure and there may be significant delays in diagnosis. As the eutopic endometrium is recognized to be abnormal in patients with endometriosis, it has been suggested that endometrial sampling could provide an indirect diagnostic approach. In particular, recent reports have suggested that the presence of nerve fibers within the endometrial functional layer could represent a specific and sensitive marker of concurrent peritoneal endometriosis. However, such studies have been performed in select patient groups and using novel sampling and analytic techniques that are not used routinely in clinical pathology laboratories. The present study was performed upon conventional endometrial biopsies from 68 patients who underwent laparoscopy for suspected endometriosis. The biopsies were stained immunohistochemically for the neural marker PGP 9.5 and examined in a blinded manner. Endometrial functional layer nerve fibers were identified in 15 (22%) biopsies overall including 9/47 (19%) cases with histologically confirmed peritoneal endometriosis and 6/21 (29% cases) without endometriosis. There was no correlation between the presence of functional layer nerve fibers and the presenting symptoms, endometrial histology, or current hormonal therapy. In our experience, endometrial functional layer nerve fibers assessment performed using standard immunohistochemical techniques on routine biopsy specimens proved neither sensitive nor specific for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Pathologists and gynecologists considering this diagnostic approach should carefully consider the methodological factors that may influence its reliability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pgp.0b013e31825b0585

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The detection of nerve fibers in 29% of women without endometriosis raised concerns regarding the assay's specificity.

    “Nonetheless, the detection of nerve fibers in 29% of women without endometriosis raised concerns regarding the assay's specificity [143].”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [143]

  • Functional endometrial layer nerve fibers assessed by PGP9.5 immunostaining were detected in 9 of 45 (22%) of histologically confirmed cases of endometriosis and in 6 of 21 (29%) of women without endometriosis.

    “Functional endometrial layer nerve fibers assessed by PGP9.5 immunostaining were detected in 9 of 45 (22%) of histologically confirmed cases of endometriosis and in 6 of 21 (29%) of women without endometriosis.”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [143]

  • Adoption of this method in a clinical laboratory failed to recapitulate the accuracy of endometrial PGP9.5 immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of women with endometriosis.

    “However, the adoption of this method in a clinical laboratory failed to recapitulate the accuracy of endometrial PGP9.5 immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of women with endometriosis [143].”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [143]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leslie, C., Ma, T., McElhinney, B., Leake, R., & Stewart, C. J. R.
Affiliations
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Stewart, Colin J.R.
Venue
International Journal of Gynecological Pathology
Published
2013-03
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
149-155
ISSN
0277-1691 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009986152
Cited by
23
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecological Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, PGP 9.5, endometrial biopsy, peritoneal endometriosis, sensitivity and specificity, eutopic endometrium, immunohistochemistry, non-invasive diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Biopsy, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Laparoscopy, Peritoneum, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Ubiquitin Thiolesterase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review