Cited by 401Sleep and Work-Related FatigueWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingWorkplace Health and Well-being

Exploring the relationship between work-related rumination, sleep quality, and work-related fatigue

Querstret, Dawn, Cropley, Mark·2012·Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

Abstract

This study examined the association among three conceptualizations of work-related rumination (affective rumination, problem-solving pondering, and detachment) with sleep quality and work-related fatigue. It was hypothesized that affective rumination and poor sleep quality would be associated with increased fatigue and that problem-solving pondering and detachment would be associated with decreased fatigue. The mediating effect of sleep quality on the relationship between work-related rumination and fatigue was also tested. An online questionnaire was completed by a heterogeneous sample of 719 adult workers in diverse occupations. The following variables were entered as predictors in a regression model: affective rumination, problem-solving pondering, detachment, and sleep quality. The dependent variables were chronic work-related fatigue (CF) and acute work-related fatigue (AF). Affective rumination was the strongest predictor of increased CF and AF. Problem-solving pondering was a significant predictor of decreased CF and AF. Poor sleep quality was predictive of increased CF and AF. Detachment was significantly negatively predictive for AF. Sleep quality partially mediated the relationship between affective rumination and fatigue and between problem-solving pondering and fatigue. Work-related affective rumination appears more detrimental to an individual's ability to recover from work than problem-solving pondering. In the context of identifying mechanisms by which demands at work are translated into ill-health, this appears to be a key finding and suggests that it is the type of work-related rumination, not rumination per se, that is important.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0028552

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bultmann, U., Kant, I., van Amelsvoort, L. G. P. M., & Kasl, S. V. (2001). Differences in Fatigue and Psychological Distress Across Occupations: Results from the Maastrich Cohort Study of Fatigue at Work. Journal of Environmental Medicine, 43 , 976-983.
  2. Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture, and community: The psychology and physiology of stress . New York: Plenum Press.
  3. Kunert, K., King, L., & Kolkhorst, F. W. (2007). Fatigue and Sleep Quality in Nurses. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing , 45 , 31-37.
  4. Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some Ruminative Thoughts. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), Advances in Social Cognition (Vol. IX, pp. 1-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Querstret, D., & Cropley, M.
Affiliations
University of Surrey (GB)
Venue
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
Published
2012
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
341-353
ISSN
  • 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1307
OpenAlex
W2035106724
Cited by
401
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
17.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
work-related rumination, affective rumination, problem-solving pondering, detachment, sleep quality, occupational fatigue, chronic fatigue, acute fatigue, mediation, occupational stress, work recovery
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Employment, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupations, Problem Solving, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Sleep Wake Disorders, Stress, Psychological, Thinking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review