Cited by 72Child Abuse and TraumaObesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and Behaviors

Childhood abuse is associated with adiposity in midlife women: possible pathways through trait anger and reproductive hormones

Open access
Midei, Aimee J., Matthews, Karen A., Bromberger, Joyce T.·2010·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between childhood abuse/neglect and central adiposity and obesity in a sample of 311 women (n = 106 black, 205 white) from the Pittsburgh site of the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Methods: SWAN included a baseline measurement of women in midlife (mean age = 45.7 years) and eight follow-up visits during which waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) were measured. The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire retrospectively assessed emotional, physical, and sexual abuse, and emotional and physical neglect in childhood. Results: Analyses of covariance showed that women with a history of any abuse/neglect, and specifically physical and sexual abuse, had significantly higher WC and BMI at baseline than women with no abuse history. A significant interaction between abuse and BMI showed that among women with BMI of <30, any abuse/neglect and certain subtypes of abuse predicted greater increases in WC over time. Additional analyses showed that Trait Anger scores and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) attenuated cross-sectional relationships between abuse/neglect and WC and BMI. Conclusion: This study suggests that abused/neglected women seem to have greater anger and lower levels of SHBG, which are associated with adiposity in midlife. SWAN = Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation; BMI = body mass index; WC = waist circumference; SHBG = sex hormone-binding globulin; FSH = follicle stimulating hormone; FEI = free estrogen index; FAI = free androgen index; CTQ = Childhood Trauma Questionnaire; SES = socioeconomic status.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0b013e3181cb5c24

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ELS/CT has been repeatedly found to be independently associated with higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome in later life.

    “and higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome (290, 294, 295) in later life”

    From Developmental Trajectories of Early Life Stress and Trauma: A Narrative Review on Neurobiological Aspects Beyond Stress System Dysregulation (2019) · cites this paper as [294]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that women with a history of childhood abuse or neglect had higher central adiposity and obesity in adulthood. That supports an association with a related outcome, but the paper does not report a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome or an independent association with that syndrome. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Midei, A. J., Matthews, K. A., & Bromberger, J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Matthews, Karen A.
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2010-02
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
215-223
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980693394
Cited by
72
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (6u01ag012535-26)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-012535, AG012531, U01AG012539, U01AG012505, AG 012535, AG012495, AG 012554, U01AG012553, U01AG012495, AG 012505, AG 012546, AG012553, U01AG012554, U01AG012546, U01AG012531, AG012539)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007560)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH059689, MH59689)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (NR-004061, U01NR004061)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
childhood abuse, child neglect, abdominal obesity, obesity, middle-aged women, trait anger, sex hormone-binding globulin, reproductive hormones, sexual abuse, physical abuse, waist circumference, body mass index, Study of Women's Health Across the Nation
MeSH terms
Anger, Anthropometry, Black or African American, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Personality Inventory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Nutrition Assessment, Body Mass Index, Women's Health, White People, Adiposity, Waist Circumference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review