Cited by 49Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Implicit Racial Bias as a Moderator of the Association Between Racial Discrimination and Hypertension: A Study of Midlife African American Men

Open access
Chae, David H., Nuru-Jeter, Amani M., Adler, Nancy E.·2012·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Empirical findings on racial discrimination and hypertension risk have been inconsistent. Some studies have found no association between self-reported experiences of discrimination and cardiovascular health outcomes, whereas others have found moderated or curvilinear relationships. The current cross-sectional study examined whether the association between racial discrimination and hypertension is moderated by implicit racial bias among African American midlife men. METHODS: This study examined the data on 91 African American men between 30 and 50 years of age. Primary variables were self-reported experiences of racial discrimination and unconscious racial bias as measured by the Black-White Implicit Association Test. Modified Poisson regression models were specified, examining hypertension, defined as a mean resting systolic level of at least 140 mm Hg or diastolic level of at least 90 mm Hg, or self-reported history of cardiovascular medication use with a physician diagnosis of hypertension. RESULTS: No main effects for discrimination or implicit racial bias were found, but the interaction of the two variables was significantly related to hypertension (χ(2)(1) = 4.89, p < .05). Among participants with an implicit antiblack bias, more frequent reports of discrimination were associated with a higher probability of hypertension, whereas among those with an implicit problack bias, it was associated with lower risk. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of experiencing racial discrimination and holding an antiblack bias may have particularly detrimental consequences on hypertension among African American midlife men, whereas holding an implicit problack bias may buffer the effects of racial discrimination. Efforts to address both internalized racial bias and racial discrimination may lower cardiovascular risk in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0b013e3182733665

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The possibility that the relationship between racism and blood pressure may be curvilinear was not explored in the current meta-analysis due to limitations in the statistical analysis program used.

    “Although some research has suggested the relationship between racism and blood pressure may be curvilinear [121, 281, 304, 402–403], this possibility was not explored in the current meta-analysis due to limitations in the statistical analysis program we utilized.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]National Center for Health Statistics Health, United States, 2007 With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans 2007 Hyattsville, MD 20698068
  2. [34]Jaccard J Interaction effects in logistic regression 2001 Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, CA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chae, D. H., Nuru-Jeter, A. M., & Adler, N. E.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Chae, David H.
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2012-11
Volume
74
Issue
9
Pages
961-964
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018722832
Cited by
49
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K01AG041787)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
racial discrimination, hypertension, implicit racial bias, African American men, middle-aged men, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Awareness, Black or African American, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Hypertension, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, San Francisco, Poisson Distribution, White People, Health Status Disparities, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review