Cited by 93Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Coding the everyday discrimination scale: implications for exposure assessment and associations with hypertension and depression among a cross section of mid-life African American women

Open access
Michaels, Eli, Thomas, Marilyn, Reeves, Alexis, Price, Melisa, Hasson, Rebecca, Chae, David, Allen, Amani·2019·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Background Studies suggest that racial discrimination impacts health via biological dysregulation due to continual adaptation to chronic psychosocial stress. Therefore, quantifying chronicity is critical for operationalising the relevant aetiological exposure and hence maximising internal validity. Using one of the most common discrimination scales in the epidemiological literature, we develop a novel approach for more accurately assessing chronicity and compare it with conventional approaches to determine whether coding influences differential exposure classification and associations with hypertension and depression among African American women. Methods Data are from a socioeconomically diverse cross section of 208 mid-life African American women in Northern California (data collection: 2012–2013). Racial discrimination was assessed using the Everyday Discrimination Scale (α=0.95), and was coded using two conventional approaches: (1) situation-based coding : number of different situations ever experienced; (2) frequency-based coding : sum of Likert scale responses ranging from 'never' to 'almost everyday'; and (3) a new chronicity-based coding approach: sum of responses, weighted to capture annual chronicity (eg, ‘a few times a month’=3×12=36×/year). Outcomes are hypertension and depressive symptomatology (10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale). Findings Exposure classification differed by coding approach, by up to 41%. There was a positive association between racial discrimination and hypertension prevalence for chronicity coding only (prevalence ratio=1.61, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.49). For depressive symptoms, a dose–response relationship of similar magnitude was observed for all three coding approaches. Conclusion Scale coding is an important methodological consideration for valid exposure assessment in epidemiological research. Coding can impact exposure classification and associations with important indicators of African American women’s mental and physical health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech-2018-211230

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One recent study found no association among a community sample of African American women, whereas another found a protective association among a sample of Black women in the South.

    “One recent study found no association among a community sample of African American women (Michaels et al., 2019), whereas another found a protective association among a sample of Black women in the South (Dressler et al., 1998).”

    From Superwoman Schema and John Henryism among African American women: An intersectional perspective on coping with racism (2023) · cites this paper as Michaels et al., 2019

    The Study and recruitment section identifies a community sample of African American women. The Results section reports no association between everyday discrimination and hypertension with situation- or frequency-based coding, but a positive association with chronicity-based coding. Thus, describing the study as finding no association omits a key qualification. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Few studies examined the John Henryism-hypertension association with separate estimates for women or in samples of only women.

    “Few studies examined the John Henryism-hypertension association with separate estimates for women or in samples of only women (Dressler et al., 1998;LeBrón et al., 2015;Michaels et al., 2019).”

    From Superwoman Schema and John Henryism among African American women: An intersectional perspective on coping with racism (2023) · cites this paper as Michaels et al., 2019

    The Methods (Study and recruitment; Analysis) describe a women-only study of everyday discrimination and hypertension, not a study of the John Henryism–hypertension association. A search for “John Henryism” found it only in a References entry for a paper about discrimination and depression. Our copy does not assess how many studies estimated the John Henryism–hypertension association in women. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]Statistics NCfH. Health, United States, 2015: with special feature on racial and ethnic health disparities 2016. 27308685

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michaels, E., Thomas, M., Reeves, A., Price, M., Hasson, R., Chae, D., & Allen, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Michaels, Eli
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-03-20
Volume
73
Issue
6
Pages
577-584
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2922982587
Cited by
93
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Susan G. Komen (GTDR14301469)
  • University of California Berkeley (Center for New Racial Studies, Experimental Social Science Library, Hellman Fund, Institute for the Study of Societal Issues, Population Center, Research Bridging Grant)
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Health & Society Scholars Program)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (UL1GM118985)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P60MD006902)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
Everyday Discrimination Scale, racial discrimination, exposure assessment, hypertension, depressive symptoms, African American women, middle-aged women, psychosocial stress, dose-response relationship
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, California, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review