Cited by 147Diversity and Career in MedicineSocial and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Unconscious race and class bias: Its association with decision making by trauma and acute care surgeons

Haider, Adil H., Schneider, Eric B., Sriram, N, Dossick, Deborah S., Scott, Valerie K., Swoboda, Sandra M., Losonczy, Lia, Haut, Elliott R. +7 more·2014·Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

Abstract

Background Recent studies have found that unconscious biases may influence physicians' clinical decision making. The objective of our study was to determine, using clinical vignettes, if unconscious race and class biases exist specifically among trauma/acute care surgeons and, if so, whether those biases impact surgeons' clinical decision making. Methods A prospective Web-based survey was administered to active members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. Participants completed nine clinical vignettes, each with three trauma/acute care surgery management questions. Race Implicit Association Test (IAT) and social class IAT assessments were completed by each participant. Multivariable, ordered logistic regression analysis was then used to determine whether implicit biases reflected on the IAT tests were associated with vignette responses. Results In total, 248 members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma participated. Of these, 79% explicitly stated that they had no race preferences and 55% stated they had no social class preferences. However, 73.5% of the participants had IAT scores demonstrating an unconscious preference toward white persons; 90.7% demonstrated an implicit preference toward upper social class persons. Only 2 of 27 vignette-based clinical decisions were associated with patient race or social class on univariate analyses. Multivariable analyses revealed no relationship between IAT scores and vignette-based clinical assessments.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ta.0000000000000392

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haider, A. H., Schneider, E. B., Sriram, N., Dossick, D. S., Scott, V. K., Swoboda, S. M., Losonczy, L., Haut, E. R., Efron, D. T., Pronovost, P. J., Freischlag, J. A., Lipsett, P. A., Cornwell, E. E., MacKenzie, E. J., & Cooper, L. A.
Affiliations
Howard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Published
2014-09
Volume
77
Issue
3
Pages
409-416
ISSN
2163-0755 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123236160
Cited by
147
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 6
FWCI
31.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (K23GM093112)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
implicit bias, racial bias, social class bias, trauma surgeons, acute care surgeons, clinical decision-making, clinical vignettes, Implicit Association Test, racial preferences
MeSH terms
Adult, Data Collection, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Prejudice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Class, Traumatology, United States, Racial Groups, Healthcare Disparities, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review