Cited by 404Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsDiversity and Career in Medicine

A systematic review of the impact of physician implicit racial bias on clinical decision making

Open access
Dehon, Erin, Weiss, Nicole, Jones, Jonathan, Faulconer, Whitney, Hinton, Elizabeth, Sterling, Sarah·2017·Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Disparities in diagnosis and treatment of racial minorities exist in the emergency department (ED). A better understanding of how physician implicit (unconscious) bias contributes to these disparities may help identify ways to eliminate such racial disparities. The objective of this systematic review was to examine and summarize the evidence on the association between physician implicit racial bias and clinical decision making. METHODS: Based on PRISMA guidelines, a structured electronic literature search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases was conducted. Eligible studies were those that: 1) included physicians, 2) included the Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit bias, 3) included an assessment of physician clinical decision making, and 4) were published in peer-reviewed journals between 1998 and 2016. Articles were reviewed for inclusion by two independent investigators. Data extraction was performed by one investigator and checked for accuracy by a second investigator. Two investigators independently scored the quality of articles using a modified version of the Downs and Black checklist. RESULTS: Of the 1,154 unique articles identified in the initial search, nine studies (n = 1,910) met inclusion criteria. Three of the nine studies involved emergency providers including residents, attending physicians, and advanced practice providers. The majority of studies used clinical vignettes to examine clinical decision making. Studies that included emergency medicine (EM) providers had vignettes relating to treatment of acute myocardial infarction, pain, and pediatric asthma. An implicit preference favoring white people was common across providers, regardless of specialty. Two of the nine studies found evidence of a relationship between implicit bias and clinical decision making; one of these studies included EM providers. This one study found that EM and internal medicine residents who demonstrated an implicit preference for white individuals were more likely to treat white patients and not black patients with thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. Evidence from the two studies reporting a relationship between physician implicit racial bias and decision making was low in quality. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature indicates that although many physicians, regardless of specialty, demonstrate an implicit preference for white people, this bias does not appear to impact their clinical decision making. Further studies on the impact of implicit racial bias on racial disparities in ED treatment are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/acem.13214

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multicollinearity was assessed using variance inflation factors; all VIF values were less than 5, and no covariates were eliminated or combined due to multicollinearity.

    “Multicollinearity was assessed using variance inflation factors (VIF); all VIF values were less than 5, and no covariates were eliminated or combined due to multicollinearity.”

    From Racial and ethnic disparities in interhospital transfer for complex emergency general surgical disease across the United States (2023) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Results and Quality Assessment sections describe study selection and quality scoring, not a multicollinearity analysis. Searches for variance inflation factors, VIF values below 5, and covariates being eliminated or combined found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Unequal Treat- ment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003.
  2. Cassell NT. Medical Treatment Decisions: Impact of Source of Motivation to Control Prejudice [Dissertation]. Baltimore: University of Maryland, 2015.
  3. Haider AH, Schneider EB, Sriram N, et al. Unconscious race and class bias. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;77: 409-16.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dehon, E., Weiss, N., Jones, J., Faulconer, W., Hinton, E., & Sterling, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Dehon, Erin
Venue
Academic Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-19
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
895-904
ISSN
  • 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-2712
OpenAlex
W2611179471
Cited by
404
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
implicit racial bias, physician bias, clinical decision-making, racial disparities, emergency department care, Implicit Association Test, acute myocardial infarction, thrombolysis, pain management, childhood asthma, racial minorities, medical residents
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Attitude of Health Personnel, Black or African American, Decision Making, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Internal Medicine, Internship and Residency, Physicians, White People, Healthcare Disparities, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review