Cited by 251Mental Health and Patient InvolvementSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

An Exploratory Analysis of Correlates of Recovery

Resnick, Sandra G., Rosenheck, Robert A., Lehman, Anthony F.·2004·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The concept of recovery has received increasing emphasis in the delivery of services to persons with schizophrenia. This study was an initial effort to develop an empirically based model of factors associated with a recovery orientation. METHODS: The authors reanalyzed data from 825 persons with schizophrenia who were assessed in the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) client survey. Multiple regression models were used to identify client and service use variables associated with each of four domains identified as important to a recovery orientation: life satisfaction, hope and optimism, knowledge about mental illness and services, and empowerment. RESULTS: In each regression model, the strongest relationship was observed between recovery orientation and lower severity of depressive symptoms. Both receipt of family psychoeducation and fewer side effects of medications were significantly and positively related to three of the four recovery domains. Psychotic symptoms were associated with less life satisfaction. Receipt of various services, including day treatment and legal services, was positively associated with knowledge about illness and services. CONCLUSIONS: Severity of psychiatric symptoms, a core feature of the biomedical perspective of mental illness, was negatively associated with a recovery orientation, and use of a variety of standard services were positively associated with a recovery orientation. Thus a polarized view of biomedical and recovery perspectives on mental illness may be unfounded, given that these perspectives appear to be mutually reinforcing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.55.5.540

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Resnick, S. G., Rosenheck, R. A., & Lehman, A. F.
Affiliations
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2004-05
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
540-547
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2096587241
Cited by
251
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 21
FWCI
26.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
recovery orientation, schizophrenia, life satisfaction, hope and optimism, empowerment, depressive symptoms, family psychoeducation, antipsychotic adverse effects, psychotic symptoms, day treatment, legal services, service utilization, biomedical model of mental illness
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Power, Psychological, Psychotic Disorders, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Comorbidity, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review