PreprintCited by 88Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic detection of functional proteoform groups from bottom-up proteomic datasets

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-021-24030-x · Paper page

Abstract

The cellular proteome, the ensemble of proteins derived from a genome, catalyzes and controls thousands of biochemical functions that are the basis of living cells. Whereas the protein coding regions of the genome of the human and many other species are well known, the complexity and composition of proteomes largely remains to be explored. This task is challenging because mechanisms including alternative splicing and post-translational modifications generally give rise to multiple distinct, but related proteins – proteoforms – per coding gene that expand the functional capacity of a cell. Bottom-up proteomics is a mass spectrometric method that infers the identity and quantity of proteins from the measurement of peptides derived from these proteins by proteolytic digestion. Whereas bottom-up proteomics has become the method of choice for the detection of translation products from essentially any gene, the inherent missing link between measured peptides and their parental proteins has so far precluded the systematic assessment of proteoforms and thus limited the resolution of proteome maps. Here we present a novel, data-driven strategy to assign peptides to unique functional proteoform groups based on peptide correlation patterns across large bottom-up proteomic datasets. Our strategy does not fully characterize specific proteoforms, as is achievable in top-down approaches. Rather, it clusters peptides into functional proteoform groups that are directly linked to the biological context of the study. This allows the detection of tens to hundreds of proteoform groups in an untargeted fashion from bottom-up proteomics experiments. We applied the strategy to two types of bottom-up proteomic datasets. The first is a protein complex co-fractionation dataset where native complexes across two different cell cycle stages were resolved and analyzed. Here, our approach enabled the systematic detection and evaluation of assembly specific proteoforms at an unprecedented scale. The second is a protein abundance vs. sample data matrix typical for bottom-up cohort studies consisting of tissue samples from the mouse BXD genetic reference panel. In either data type the method detected state-specific proteoform groups that could be linked to distinct molecular mechanisms including proteolytic cleavage, alternative splicing and phosphorylation. We envision that the presented approach lays the foundation for a systematic assessment of proteoforms and their functional implications directly from bottom-up proteomic datasets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.12.22.423928

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. 10.1038/nature03001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199594689.001.0001 · DOI
  3. 2020, Proteomic and interactomic insights into the molecular basis of cell functional diversity, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 21, 327, 10.1038/s41580-020-0231-2 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nrm.2017.27 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nmeth.2369 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.gene.2012.07.083 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/ejhg.2012.129 · DOI
  8. 2010, Alternative splicing and muscular dystrophy, RNA Biol, 7, 441, 10.4161/rna.7.4.12258 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nature01511 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nature19949 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 2019, Identification and Quantification of Proteoforms by Mass Spectrometry, Proteomics, 19, 1800361, 10.1002/pmic.201800361 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nature10575 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2017, Identification and Characterization of Human Proteoforms by Top-Down LC-21 Tesla FT-ICR Mass Spectrometry, J. Proteome Res, 16, 1087, 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00696 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2016, Progress in Top-Down Proteomics and the Analysis of Proteoforms, Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem, 9, 499, 10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041550 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1074/mcp.R500012-MCP200 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 2012, Targeted Data Extraction of the MS/MS Spectra Generated by Data-independent Acquisition: A New Concept for Consistent and Accurate Proteome Analysis, Mol. & Cell. Proteomics, 11, O111
  17. 10.1074/mcp.M114.044305 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/s41467-017-00249-5 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1038/nbt.3908 · DOI
  20. 10.15252/msb.20188438 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1074/mcp.O117.067728 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1074/mcp.M113.030932 · DOI
  23. 2014, Protein inference using peptide quantification patterns, J. Proteome Res, 13, 3191, 10.1021/pr401072g · DOI
  24. Forshed, J. et al. Enhanced information output from shotgun proteomics data by protein quantification and peptide quality control (PQPQ). Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10, (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1101/2020.08.21.261818 · DOI
  26. Bamberger, C. et al. Deducing the presence of proteins and proteoforms in quantitative proteomics. Nat. Commun. 9, (2018). · DOI
  27. 2020, A Global Screen for Assembly State Changes of the Mitotic Proteome by SEC-SWATH-MS, Cell Syst, 10, 133, 10.1016/j.cels.2020.01.001 · DOI
  28. 2020, Complex-centric proteome profiling by SEC-SWATH-MS for the parallel detection of hundreds of protein complexes, Nat. Protoc, 15, 2341, 10.1038/s41596-020-0332-6 · DOI
  29. 10.1074/mcp.RA118.000554 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/nar/gky1049 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1038/nbt.2841 · DOI
  32. 10.1074/mcp.O114.047035 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1038/nmeth.4398 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Karayel, Ö. et al. Comparative phosphoproteomic analysis reveals signaling networks regulating monopolar and bipolar cytokinesis. Sci. Rep. 8, (2018). · DOI
  35. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90463-O · DOI
  36. 10.1016/0962-8924(93)90011-O · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00221-9 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.advenzreg.2009.12.001 · DOI
  39. 10.1126/scisignal.2001796 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s00018-014-1699-8 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq054 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 2020, The Skyline ecosystem: Informatics for quantitative mass spectrometry proteomics, Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 39, 229, 10.1002/mas.21540 · DOI
  43. 10.1126/science.1067861 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00589-0 · DOI
  45. 10.1083/jcb.144.6.1097 · DOI
  46. 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11370 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/nrm.2016.147 · DOI
  48. 10.1074/jbc.M003781200 · DOI
  49. 10.1007/s00401-016-1610-9 · DOI
  50. 10.1074/jbc.M113.515700 · DOI
  51. 10.1074/jbc.M211875200 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2528-15.2016 · DOI
  53. 10.1074/jbc.274.43.30914 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/s12276-018-0116-z · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.08.008 · DOI
  56. 10.1186/s13059-018-1467-4 · DOI
  57. Santos, R. F. , Oliveira, L. , Brown, M. H. & Carmo, A. M. Domain-specific CD>/scp> 6 monoclonal antibodies identify CD>/scp> 6 isoforms generated by alternative-splicing. Immunology 157, imm.13087 (2019). · DOI
  58. 2017, Optimization of Experimental Parameters in Data-Independent Mass Spectrometry Significantly Increases Depth and Reproducibility of Results, Mol. & Cell. Proteomics, 16, 2296LP, 10.1074/mcp.RA117.000314 · DOI
  59. 10.1101/656207 · DOI
  60. 10.1074/mcp.TIR119.001906 · DOI
  61. 10.1093/nar/gky1106 · DOI
  62. 10.1038/nmeth.3144 · DOI
  63. 2016, Proteogenomics: Integrating Next-Generation Sequencing and Mass Spectrometry to Characterize Human Proteomic Variation, Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem, 9, 521, 10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041722 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/nature13319 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Wang, D. et al. A deep proteome and transcriptome abundance atlas of 29 healthy human tissues. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, (2019). · DOI · Paper page
  66. Doll, S. et al. Region and cell-type resolved quantitative proteomic map of the human heart. Nat. Commun. 8, (2017). · DOI
  67. 10.1038/nature13302 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1093/nar/gkn923 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1007/s13361-012-0516-6 · DOI
  71. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00717 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Bludau, I., Frank, M., Dörig, C., Cai, Y., Heusel, M., Rosenberger, G., Picotti, P., Collins, B. C., Röst, H., & Aebersold, R.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Röst, Hannes
  • Aebersold, Ruedi
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-12-22
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
3810-3810
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3175993123
Cited by
88
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 6
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (175127, 173572, ERC-20140AdG 670821, 183933, 161435, 310030E, 191046)
  • SystemsX.ch
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Keywords
proteoforms, shotgun proteomics, protein abundance, protein assembly, post-translational modification
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Humans, Peptides, Benchmarking, Protein Isoforms, Proteomics, Mice, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Workflow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review