PreprintCited by 13Memory and Neural MechanismsSpatial Cognition and NavigationNeural dynamics and brain function

“A compressed representation of spatial distance in the rodent hippocampus’’

Open access
Sheehan, Daniel J., Charczynski, Stephen, Fordyce, Blake A., Hasselmo, Michael E., Howard, Marc W.·2021·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Principal cells in the rodent hippocampus often fire in response to traversal through a specific spatial location (place cells), as well as elapsed time during an imposed temporal delay or after stimulus offset (time cells). Sequences of time cells unfold rapidly at first, with many time cells with narrow time fields. As the triggering event recedes into the past, time cells are fewer and have broader fields. This means that the representation of time in the hippocampus is compressed with greater resolution for time points near the present. Using tetrode recordings we measured individual CA1 units while rats traveled along a track that could be changed in length. Consistent with previous results, most place cells coded for distance from the starting point of the trajectory. Critically, place cells became less numerous and showed gradually widening fields with distance from the starting location. These results suggest that as the animal leaves a landmark, the hippocampal place code forms a compressed representation of distance from the starting location. The representation of time and space in the hippocampus have similar properties suggesting that they arise from similar computational mechanisms. Significance Statement: The hippocampus represents relationships between events in time and space. It has been hypothesized that temporal and spatial relationships are the result of a common computational mechanism. Previous work has shown that the representation of time in the hippocampus is compressed, with less neural resolution for more temporally remote events, consistent with the observation that temporal memory is worse for events further in the past. This paper shows an analogous result for spatial relationships. Place cells coded for distance from the start of a journey. As distance increased, place fields became broader and less numerous, showing a decrease in spatial resolution. This result suggests a unified coding scheme for the dimensions of time and space in the rodent hippocampus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.02.15.431306

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Responses to the appropriate sequential contexts in a CSCG naturally explain the remapping of place fields observed as the track length varies.

    “Responses to the appropriate sequential contexts in a CSCG naturally explain the remapping of place fields observed as the track length varies.”

    From Space is a latent sequence: A theory of the hippocampus (2024) · cites this paper as [28]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [42]42. Shankar, K. H., & Howard, M. W. (2013). Optimally fuzzy temporal memory. Journal of machine Learning Research. 14: 3785-3812.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheehan, D. J., Charczynski, S., Fordyce, B. A., Hasselmo, M. E., & Howard, M. W.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Sheehan, Daniel J.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-02-16
OpenAlex
W3133335466
Cited by
13
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (N00014-19-1-2571)
  • Office of Naval Research (MURI N00014‐19‐1‐2571, NIBIB R01EB022864, N00014-19-1-2571, N00014-19, N00014)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH052090, R01MH095297, R01MH052090, MH120073, R01MH120073)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB022864)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
hippocampus, place cells, time cells, CA1 neurons, temporal memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review