The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Targeted degradation of PCNA outperforms stoichiometric inhibition to result in programed cell death
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.chembiol.2022.10.005 · Paper page
Abstract
Targeted protein degradation has emerged as a powerful technology – both as a biological tool and for broadening the therapeutic proteome. As tools to probe this approach on historically intractable targets, we have previously advanced ‘biodegraders’ — targeted degradation fusion constructs composed of mini-proteins/peptides linked to modified E3 ligase receptors. Herein, we gain deeper insights into the utility and potential of biodegraders, through a detailed study on Con1-SPOP, a biodegrader which rapidly degrades the potential cancer target, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). In a variety of settings, the active biodegrader (Con1-SPOP) proved pharmacologically superior to its stoichiometric (non-degrading) inhibitor equivalent (Con1-SPOP mut ). Specifically, in addition to more potent anti-proliferative effects in both 2D cell culture and 3D spheroids, PCNA degradation uniquely induced DNA damage, cell apoptosis and necrosis. Global proteomic profiling of a stable cell-line expressing Con1-SPOP under doxycycline (Dox) induction revealed that impaired mitotic division and mitochondria dysfunction is a direct consequence of PCNA degradation, effects not seen with the stoichiometric inhibitor protein. To evaluate the therapeutic potential of biodegraders, we showed that Dox-induced Con1-SPOP achieved complete tumor-growth inhibition in a xenograft model. To explore application of biodegraders as a novel therapeutic modality, modified mRNA encoding Con1-SPOP was synthesized and encapsulated into lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The approach successfully delivered mRNA in vitro to deplete endogenous PCNA within hours of application and with nanomolar potency. Overall, our results demonstrate the utility of biodegraders as biological tools and highlight target-degradation as a more efficacious approach versus stoichiometric inhibition. Finally, once in vivo delivery and expression are optimized, biodegraders may be leveraged as an exciting therapeutic modality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine
Polack, F. P., Thomas, S. J., Kitchin, N., Absalon, J., Gurtman, A., Lockhart, S., Perez, J. L., Pérez Marc, G., Moreira, E. D., Zerbini, C., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2034577 · Cited by 14,592
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 69
- 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.027 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1182/blood-2015-07-567958 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41589-019-0414-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.022 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41589-019-0362-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.141230798 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41573-019-0047-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41589-019-0279-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M116.768853 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1920251117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/jbc.M113.544825 · DOI
- 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00127 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep01156 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep14269 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.12.043 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep28352 · DOI
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3731 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-020-17022-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01337 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2020.06.26.174565 · DOI
- 10.1002/emmm.200900004 · DOI
- 10.1186/1742-4690-11-4 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.25.21.9350-9359.2005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.054 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.20.4.1206-1218.2000 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.01.022 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0592 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi992498r · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-018-36910-2 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa2022483 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, Gamma-H2AX – a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks, In vivo (Athens, Greece), 22, 305
- 10.4061/2010/920161 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00110-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1029 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tips.2016.06.006 · DOI
- 10.4161/cc.5.8.2692 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-10349-z · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkz1031 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/jcs.079509 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrd.2017.243 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMoa2024671 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1914673116 · DOI
- 10.1021/mp049970+ · DOI
- 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.01.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gad.1192704 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.152053599 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.22.18.6521-6532.2002 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M113.457440 · DOI
- 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.56 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/wnan.1530 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrd.2017.243 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-018-06936-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s40265-018-0983-6 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1908052116 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/15476286.2018.1450054 · DOI
- 10.1038/35099560 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1093620 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncb2408 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkr695 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6893 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/molecules23123310 · DOI
- 10.1089/nat.2018.0734 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, S. C., Gopal, P., Lim, S., Wei, X., Chandramohan, A., Mangadu, R., Smith, J., Ng, S., Gindy, M., Phan, U., Henry, B., & Partridge, A.
- Affiliations
- MSD (Singapore) (SG)
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Partridge, Anthony
- Venue
- Cell chemical biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-01-30
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1601-1615.e7
- ISSN
- 2451-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4307905483
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cell chemical biology (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Keywords
- targeted protein degradation, PCNA, SPOP, E3 ubiquitin ligase, DNA damage, apoptosis, necrosis, mitotic division, mitochondrial dysfunction, tumor growth inhibition, mRNA delivery, lipid nanoparticles, doxycycline induction, antiproliferative activity
- MeSH terms
- Liposomes, Apoptosis, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review