PreprintCited by 31Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted degradation of PCNA outperforms stoichiometric inhibition to result in programed cell death

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.chembiol.2022.10.005 · Paper page

Abstract

Targeted protein degradation has emerged as a powerful technology – both as a biological tool and for broadening the therapeutic proteome. As tools to probe this approach on historically intractable targets, we have previously advanced ‘biodegraders’ — targeted degradation fusion constructs composed of mini-proteins/peptides linked to modified E3 ligase receptors. Herein, we gain deeper insights into the utility and potential of biodegraders, through a detailed study on Con1-SPOP, a biodegrader which rapidly degrades the potential cancer target, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). In a variety of settings, the active biodegrader (Con1-SPOP) proved pharmacologically superior to its stoichiometric (non-degrading) inhibitor equivalent (Con1-SPOP mut ). Specifically, in addition to more potent anti-proliferative effects in both 2D cell culture and 3D spheroids, PCNA degradation uniquely induced DNA damage, cell apoptosis and necrosis. Global proteomic profiling of a stable cell-line expressing Con1-SPOP under doxycycline (Dox) induction revealed that impaired mitotic division and mitochondria dysfunction is a direct consequence of PCNA degradation, effects not seen with the stoichiometric inhibitor protein. To evaluate the therapeutic potential of biodegraders, we showed that Dox-induced Con1-SPOP achieved complete tumor-growth inhibition in a xenograft model. To explore application of biodegraders as a novel therapeutic modality, modified mRNA encoding Con1-SPOP was synthesized and encapsulated into lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). The approach successfully delivered mRNA in vitro to deplete endogenous PCNA within hours of application and with nanomolar potency. Overall, our results demonstrate the utility of biodegraders as biological tools and highlight target-degradation as a more efficacious approach versus stoichiometric inhibition. Finally, once in vivo delivery and expression are optimized, biodegraders may be leveraged as an exciting therapeutic modality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.01.29.478266

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.027 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1182/blood-2015-07-567958 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/s41589-019-0414-3 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.022 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41589-019-0362-y · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1073/pnas.141230798 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.09.010 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/s41573-019-0047-y · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/s41589-019-0279-5 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1074/jbc.M116.768853 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1073/pnas.1920251117 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1074/jbc.M113.544825 · DOI
  14. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00127 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/srep01156 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/srep14269 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.12.043 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/srep28352 · DOI
  19. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3731 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/s41467-020-17022-w · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01337 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1101/2020.06.26.174565 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/emmm.200900004 · DOI
  24. 10.1186/1742-4690-11-4 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/MCB.25.21.9350-9359.2005 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.054 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.007 · DOI
  28. 10.1128/MCB.20.4.1206-1218.2000 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.01.022 · DOI
  30. 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0592 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/bi992498r · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41598-018-36910-2 · DOI
  33. 10.1056/NEJMoa2022483 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2008, Gamma-H2AX – a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks, In vivo (Athens, Greece), 22, 305
  35. 10.4061/2010/920161 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00110-7 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1029 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.tips.2016.06.006 · DOI
  39. 10.4161/cc.5.8.2692 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41467-019-10349-z · DOI
  41. 10.1093/nar/gkz1031 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.007 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1242/jcs.079509 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/nrd.2017.243 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1056/NEJMoa2024671 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1073/pnas.1914673116 · DOI
  48. 10.1021/mp049970+ · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.01.013 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1101/gad.1192704 · DOI
  52. 10.1073/pnas.152053599 · DOI
  53. 10.1128/MCB.22.18.6521-6532.2002 · DOI
  54. 10.1074/jbc.M113.457440 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.56 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1002/wnan.1530 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1038/nrd.2017.243 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1038/s41467-018-06936-1 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1007/s40265-018-0983-6 · DOI
  60. 10.1073/pnas.1908052116 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1080/15476286.2018.1450054 · DOI
  62. 10.1038/35099560 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1126/science.1093620 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1038/ncb2408 · DOI
  65. 10.1093/nar/gkr695 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.06.010 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz6893 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.3390/molecules23123310 · DOI
  69. 10.1089/nat.2018.0734 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Chang, S. C., Gopal, P., Lim, S., Wei, X., Chandramohan, A., Mangadu, R., Smith, J., Ng, S., Gindy, M., Phan, U., Henry, B., & Partridge, A.
Affiliations
  • MSD (Singapore) (SG)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Partridge, Anthony
Venue
Cell chemical biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-01-30
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
1601-1615.e7
ISSN
2451-9448 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307905483
Cited by
31
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell chemical biology (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
targeted protein degradation, PCNA, SPOP, E3 ubiquitin ligase, DNA damage, apoptosis, necrosis, mitotic division, mitochondrial dysfunction, tumor growth inhibition, mRNA delivery, lipid nanoparticles, doxycycline induction, antiproliferative activity
MeSH terms
Liposomes, Apoptosis, Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review