The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying constraint in the human mitochondrial genome
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41586-024-08048-x · Paper page
Abstract
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has an important, yet often overlooked, role in health and disease. Constraint models quantify the removal of deleterious variation from the population by selection, representing a powerful tool for identifying genetic variation underlying human phenotypes 1–4 . However, a constraint model for the mtDNA has not been developed, due to its unique features. Here we describe the development of a mitochondrial constraint model and its application to the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD), a large-scale population dataset reporting mtDNA variation across 56,434 humans 5 . Our results demonstrate strong depletion of expected variation, suggesting most deleterious mtDNA variants remain undiscovered. To aid their identification, we compute constraint metrics for every mitochondrial protein, tRNA, and rRNA gene, revealing a spectrum of intolerance to variation. We characterize the most constrained regions within genes via regional constraint, and positions across the entire mtDNA via local constraint, showing their enrichment in pathogenic variation and functionally critical sites, including topological clustering in 3D protein and RNA structures. Notably, we identify constraint at often overlooked sites, such as rRNAs and non-coding regions. Lastly, we demonstrate how these metrics can improve the discovery of mtDNA variation underlying rare and common human phenotypes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 89
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41588-018-0294-6 · DOI
- 10.1101/148353 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003709 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.276013.121 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.054 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41576-020-00284-x · DOI
- 10.3389/fphys.2018.01487 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a011403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/290457a0 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrdp.2016.80 · DOI
- 10.1002/humu.24107 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-022-30805-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbabio.2015.05.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41588-021-00868-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aau6520 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.203216.115 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1409328111 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1906331116 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41556-017-0017-8 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mito.2011.09.003 · DOI
- 10.1086/381505 · DOI
- 10.1534/genetics.105.043901 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41588-019-0572-y · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.02935 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/798264 · DOI
- 10.1002/0471250953.bi0123s44 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.24551 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-021820-101354 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abc4209 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2018.11.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tig.2004.09.014 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1355838200001047 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41436-019-0746-0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa1193 · DOI
- 10.1086/381133 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exger.2014.03.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/embor.2012.161 · DOI
- 10.1002/iub.50 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1815675116 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.08.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.xgen.2021.100006 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.09.20.22280151 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.08.20.504670 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.10.007 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2212417119 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1147786 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2477-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41588-018-0294-6 · DOI
- 10.1101/148353 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gr.276013.121 · DOI
- 10.1002/humu.24107 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aau6520 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.203216.115 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1409328111 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1906331116 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41588-019-0572-y · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.02935 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/798264 · DOI
- 10.1002/0471250953.bi0123s44 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abc4209 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaa1193 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.09.20.22280151 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003794 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.022 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41588-019-0557-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.015 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.69344 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac216 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky1049 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005867 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkx1153 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41431-019-0477-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg299 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.050 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41422-018-0071-1 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.58362 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.26269 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nargab/lqac034 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Lake, N. J., Liu, W., Battle, S. L., Laricchia, K. M., Tiao, G., Puiu, D., Compton, A. G., Cowie, S., Christodoulou, J., Thorburn, D. R., Zhao, H., Arking, D. E., Sunyaev, S. R., & Lek, M.
- Affiliations
- Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
- Yale University (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lake, Nicole J.
- Lek, Monkol
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-12-19
- Volume
- 635
- Issue
- 8038
- Pages
- 390-397
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11646341
- OpenAlex
- W4403450829
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 16.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Yale University
- Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin Research Institute
- Children's Hospital Foundation
- Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute
- Royal Children's Hospital Foundation
- State Government of Victoria
- National Institutes of Health (1s10od028669-01, 17731, UL1TR001863)
- Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17228)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1155244, 1159456)
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG021334)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL144569)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- mitochondrial DNA, constraint model, heteroplasmy, mitochondrial ribosomal RNA, mitochondrial protein-coding genes, mitochondrial tRNA genes, pathogenic variants, disease-associated variants, gnomAD
- MeSH terms
- Heteroplasmy, DNA, Mitochondrial, Female, Humans, Mitochondria, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Phenotype, RNA, Ribosomal, RNA, Transfer, Selection, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Genome, Human, Mitochondrial Proteins, Databases, Genetic, Genome, Mitochondrial, Datasets as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review