The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Suite of Designed Protein Cages Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Protein Fragment-Based Protocols
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.str.2024.02.017 · Paper page
Abstract
Designed protein cages and related materials provide unique opportunities for applications in biotechnology and medicine, while methods for their creation remain challenging and unpredictable. In the present study, we apply new computational approaches to design a suite of new tetrahedrally symmetric, self-assembling protein cages. For the generation of docked poses, we emphasize a protein fragment-based approach, while for de novo interface design, a comparison of computational protocols highlights the power and increased experimental success achieved using the machine learning program ProteinMPNN. In relating information from docking and design, we observe that agreement between fragment-based sequence preferences and ProteinMPNN sequence inference correlates with experimental success. Additional insights for designing polar interactions are highlighted by experimentally testing larger and more polar interfaces. In all, using X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM, we report five structures for seven protein cages, with atomic resolution in the best case reaching 2.0 Å. We also report structures of two incompletely assembled protein cages, providing unique insights into one type of assembly failure. The new set of designed cages and their structures add substantially to the body of available protein nanoparticles, and to methodologies for their creation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 84
- 10.1126/science.abj7662 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.add1964 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.041614998 · DOI
- 10.1093/protein/gzab008 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/2022.12.01.518682 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-022-01618-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-03120-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.046 · DOI
- 10.3390/biom13071122 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41541-020-00223-1 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03530-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03365-x · DOI
- 10.1021/jacs.9b13462 · DOI
- 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00407 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-019-51017-y · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2305494120 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1128/mr.53.2.242-255.1989 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1113397 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi900641c · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1201504109 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2013.10.044 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-021-21251-y · DOI
- 10.1126/science.abm1183 · DOI
- 10.7554/elife.57659 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchem.2107 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-023-05993-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.028 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.03.069 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.5560060901 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.031 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.2187 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.2610 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.26030 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.12.073 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3802 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00033 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.5560020916 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13404 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aaf8818 · DOI
- 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1648 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.604 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.05.006 · DOI
- Ingraham, J. , Garg, V.K. , Barzilay, R. , and Jaakkola, T. (2019). Generative models for graph-based protein design. Advances in neural information processing systems.
- 10.1038/s41467-023-38328-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.2792 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2021.07.012 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm274 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1179513 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3941 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75245-4 · DOI
- 10.1006/smvy.1997.0102 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2009.06.013 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1908723117 · DOI
- 10.1101/2023.08.04.551935 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006112 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010633 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.4510 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0059004 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0268253 · DOI
- 10.12688/f1000research.7931.1 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.340230412 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1617873114 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.1818 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq404 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1321126111 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0020450 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.pep.2005.01.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.4169 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/s2059798319011471 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.3943 · DOI
- 10.1002/pro.3235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/s2059798318006551 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444904019158 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/s1600576720013412 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Meador, K., Castells-Graells, R., Aguirre, R., Sawaya, M. R., Arbing, M. A., Sherman, T., Senarathne, C., & Yeates, T. O.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yeates, Todd O.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Structure
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-10-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 751-765.e11
- ISSN
- 0969-2126 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11162342
- OpenAlex
- W4392976128
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 2.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Structure (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (76SF00515, DE–AC02–76SF00515, AC02‐76SF00515, P30-GM133894, DEFC0202ER63421, FC02-02ER63421, DE-AC02-)
- Oregon Health and Science University
- National Institutes of Health (DE-FC02-02ER63421, 1s10od021512-01, DE-AC02-76SF00515)
- Office of Science (AC02-76SF00515, 02ER63421, DE-AC02-76SF0051 5, DE-AC02, DEFC0202ER63421, 76SF00515)
- University of California, Los Angeles (DE-FC02-02ER63421, U24GM129547)
- U.S. Public Health Service (T32GM008496)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008496, S10OD021512, U24GM129541, R01GM129854, DE-AC02-76SF00515, U24GM129547, P30GM133894, P30GM124165)
- Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02, DE-FC02-02ER63421, 76SF00515, AC02-76SF00515, DE-AC-02-76SF00515)
- Biological and Environmental Research (DE‐FC02‐02ER63421, DE- AC0276SF00515, P30GM133894)
- California NanoSystems Institute
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (DEAC02−76SF00515, AC02‐76SF00515)
- Common Fund
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Keywords
- protein cages, protein self-assembly, tetrahedral symmetry, ProteinMPNN, knowledge-based design, protein docking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review