Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 776

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ways of dying: multiple pathways to apoptosis

Open access
Adams, Jerry M.·2003·Genes & Development

Abstract

In order to eliminate cells that are redundant, damaged, or infected, metazoan organisms have evolved the cell suicide mechanism termed apoptosis (Kerr et al. 1972). This genetic program is vital for normal development, for maintenance of tissue homeostasis, and for an effective immune system. Not surprisingly therefore, its disturbance is implicated in numerous pathological conditions, ranging from degenerative disorders to autoimmunity and cancer (Cory and Adams 2002; Cory et al. 2003). The cell’s death throes are choreographed by a set of previously dormant proteases, the caspases, which cleave several hundred cellular substrates (Thornberry and Lazebnik 1998). Two principal pathways to caspase activation have been recognized. One is triggered by engagement of so called “death receptors” on the cell surface (Strasser et al. 2000; Ashkenazi 2002). The other, of more ancient origin, is provoked by various forms of stress, including inadequate cytokine support and diverse types of intracellular damage. During stress, the cell’s decision on whether to invoke the suicide program—“to be or not to be”—rests primarily with the Bcl-2 family. Its interacting opposing members integrate developmental cues with the signals received from other cells and assess intracellular damage to determine whether to throw the caspase execution switch (Gross et al. 1999; Cory and Adams 2002; Cory et al. 2003). Early in stress-induced apoptosis of vertebrate cells, the outer membrane of the mitochondria is permeabilized, releasing cytochrome c and other death-promoting proteins (Newmeyer and Ferguson-Miller 2003). Because Bcl-2 can prevent this change, it has been widely assumed that commitment to all forms of stress-induced apoptosis, that is, all those regulated by the Bcl-2 family, requires this step to initiate all relevant caspase activation, and hence that Bcl-2 and its anti-apoptotic relatives function as guardians of mitochondrial integrity (Green and Reed 1998; Gross et al. 1999; Wang 2001). That viewpoint is challenged by recent findings. It will be argued here that in stress-induced apoptosis, as in death receptor signaling (Strasser et al. 2000; Ashkenazi 2002), caspases can be activated upstream or independently of mitochondria, and hence that the mitochondrial breach may often simply deliver the coup de grace to a cell already on the path to death. A related theme is that the Bcl-2 cohort must man checkpoints at several sites in the cell. Finally, the vexed unresolved issue of how the opposing factions of the Bcl-2 family govern caspase activation is addressed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.1126903

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Adams, J. M.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2003-10-15
Volume
17
Issue
20
Pages
2481-2495
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W1996813579
Cited by
776
References
10
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.