Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 35

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The p53–Mdm2 interaction and the E3 ligase activity of Mdm2/Mdm4 are conserved from lampreys to humans

Coffill, Cynthia R., Lee, Alison P., Siau, Jia Wei, Chee, Sharon M., Joseph, Thomas L., Tan, Yaw Sing, Madhumalar, Arumugam, Tay, Boon-Hui, Brenner, Sydney, Verma, Chandra S., Ghadessy, Farid J., Venkatesh, Byrappa, Lane, David P.·2016·Genes & Development

Abstract

The extant jawless vertebrates, represented by lampreys and hagfish, are the oldest group of vertebrates and provide an interesting genomic evolutionary pivot point between invertebrates and jawed vertebrates. Through genome analysis of one of these jawless vertebrates, the Japanese lamprey ( Lethenteron japonicum ), we identified all three members of the important p53 transcription factor family— Tp53 , Tp63 , and Tp73 —as well as the Mdm2 and Mdm4 genes. These genes and their products are significant cellular regulators in human cancer, and further examination of their roles in this most distant vertebrate relative sheds light on their origin and coevolution. Their important role in response to DNA damage has been highlighted by the discovery of multiple copies of the Tp53 gene in elephants. Expression of lamprey p53, Mdm2, and Mdm4 proteins in mammalian cells reveals that the p53–Mdm2 interaction and the Mdm2/Mdm4 E3 ligase activity existed in the common ancestor of vertebrates and have been conserved for >500 million years of vertebrate evolution. Lamprey Mdm2 degrades human p53 with great efficiency, but this interaction is not blocked by currently available small molecule inhibitors of the human HDM2 protein, suggesting utility of lamprey Mdm2 in the study of the human p53 signaling pathway.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.274118.115

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1001/jama.2015.13134 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1078 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.035 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1128/MCB.24.3.1219-1231.2004 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1021/cb3005148 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0104914 · DOI
  7. 10.1021/ja804289g · DOI
  8. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203468 · DOI
  9. 10.4161/cc.11.5.19445 · DOI
  10. 10.1074/jbc.275.12.8945 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1073/pnas.90.3.838 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.4161/cc.9.15.12408 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/nm.2033 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.4161/cc.9.10.11732 · doi:10.4161/cc.9.10.11732
  15. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800267-4.00002-X · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nrd4236 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/358015a0 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.4161/cc.9.4.10616 · DOI
  19. 10.4161/cc.10.24.18567 · DOI
  20. 10.1074/jbc.M003107200 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.4161/cc.6.21.4923 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nrm3086 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/0014-5793(92)81106-V · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.026 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1101/cshperspect.a001115 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/cdd.2011.120 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2010, Differences in the transactivation domains of p53 family members: a computational study, BMC Genomics, 11:, S5, 10.1186/1471-2164-11-S1-S5 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202951 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1042/BJ20150517 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1073/pnas.1315760110 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.gene.2011.06.030 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1007/s00427-008-0208-1 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.tig.2011.12.002 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1093/emboj/cdg579 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00852-5 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1242/dev.074716 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1073/pnas.0902358106 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.028 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/ng.2568 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1038/nature05337 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.012 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1038/nrc864 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0081068 · DOI
  44. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062564 · DOI

Cited by

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Coffill, C. R., Lee, A. P., Siau, J. W., Chee, S. M., Joseph, T. L., Tan, Y. S., Madhumalar, A., Tay, B.-H., Brenner, S., Verma, C. S., Ghadessy, F. J., Venkatesh, B., & Lane, D. P.
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2016-01-21
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
281-292
ISSN
  • 0890-9369
  • 1549-5477
Cited by
35
References
5
Language
en
Funders
Agency for Science, Technology and Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The p53–Mdm2 interaction and the E3 ligase activity of Mdm2/Mdm4 are conserved from lampreys to humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/gad.274118.115
The paper
Coffill, C. R., Lee, A. P., Siau, J. W., Chee, S. M., Joseph, T. L., Tan, Y. S., Madhumalar, A., Tay, B.-H., Brenner, S., Verma, C. S., Ghadessy, F. J., Venkatesh, B., & Lane, D. P. (2016). The p53–Mdm2 interaction and the E3 ligase activity of Mdm2/Mdm4 are conserved from lampreys to humans. Genes & Development. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.274118.115

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.