The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Instability of the Ackerman-Carroll-Wise model, and problems with massive vectors during inflation
Open accessAbstract
We prove that the anisotropic inflationary background of the Ackerman-Carroll-Wise model, characterized by a fixed-norm vector field, is unstable. We found the instability by explicitly solving the linearized equations for the most general set of perturbations around this background, and by noticing that the solutions diverge close to horizon crossing. This happens because one perturbation becomes a ghost at that moment. A simplified computation, with only the perturbations of the vector field included, shows the same instability, clarifying the origin of the problem. We then discuss several other models, with a particular emphasis on the case of a nonminimal coupling to the curvature, in which vector fields are used either to support an anisotropic expansion, or to generate cosmological perturbations on an isotropic background. In many cases, the mass squared of the vector needs to be negative; we show that, as a consequence, the longitudinal vector mode is a ghost (a field with negative kinetic term, and negative energy, and not simply a tachyon). We comment on problems that arise at the quantum level. In particular, the presence of a ghost can be a serious difficulty for the UV completion that such models require in the subhorizon regime.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluctuations in σ may be converted into adiabatic density perturbations by a variety of proposed mechanisms; for instance σ could be a curvaton.
“The fluctuations in σ may be converted into adiabatic density perturbations by a variety of proposed mechanisms; for instance σ could be a curvaton [35].”
From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [35]
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes a proposed mechanism by which fluctuations of a test field χ could be transferred to primordial density perturbations. It does not identify σ as that field, describe multiple mechanisms, or propose that σ could be a curvaton. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wald, R. M. (1983) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.2118 · Cited by 838
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/225 · DOI
- 10.1086/310075 · DOI
- 10.1086/377226 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07409.x · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.023507 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.071301 · DOI
- 10.1086/444454 · DOI
- 10.1086/421904 · DOI
- 10.1086/382267 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/421972 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.031301 · DOI
- A. E. Gumrukcuoglu, 2008, Proceedings of the 11th Marcel Grossmann Meeting On General Relativity
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/11/005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/09/006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/04/004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.103525 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.023007 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.124017 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.2380 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.105012 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.40.967 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/07/007 · DOI
- 10.1086/587451 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/021 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/06/027 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.023505 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.083510 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/06/009 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/034 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-Z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.123525 · DOI · Paper page
- R. Arnowitt, 1962, Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspa.1939.0140 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043543 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/06/018 · DOI
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/076 · DOI
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2004/05/074 · DOI · Paper page
- V. F. Mukhanov, 1985, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 41, 402
- V. F. Mukhanov, 1985, JETP Lett., 41, 493
- 10.1143/PTP.76.1036 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications
Heisenberg, L. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.006 · Cited by 419
Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation
Blanco-Pillado, J. J., & Salem, M. P. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/07/007 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Himmetoglu, B., Contaldi, C. R., & Peloso, M.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-03-18
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W1759558465
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 8.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/G000743/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- anisotropic inflation, ghost fields, massive vector field, linear perturbations, horizon crossing, tachyons, UV completion, quantum cosmology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review