The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ghost instabilities of cosmological models with vector fields nonminimally coupled to the curvature
Open accessAbstract
We prove that many cosmological models characterized by vectors nonminimally coupled to the curvature (such as the Turner-Widrow mechanism for the production of magnetic fields during inflation, and models of vector inflation or vector curvaton) contain ghosts. The ghosts are associated with the longitudinal vector polarization present in these models and are found from studying the sign of the eigenvalues of the kinetic matrix for the physical perturbations. Ghosts introduce two main problems: (1) they make the theories ill defined at the quantum level in the high energy/subhorizon regime (and create serious problems for finding a well-behaved UV completion), and (2) they create an instability already at the linearized level. This happens because the eigenvalue corresponding to the ghost crosses zero during the cosmological evolution. At this point the linearized equations for the perturbations become singular (we show that this happens for all the models mentioned above). We explicitly solve the equations in the simplest cases of a vector without a vacuum expectation value in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker geometry, and of a vector with a vacuum expectation value plus a cosmological constant, and we show that indeed the solutions of the linearized equations diverge when these equations become singular.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because the elements of δC_{ll'mm'} do not fall off very rapidly with increasing l, there is hope to gather sufficient statistics to detect them despite their suppression by the present-day curvature parameter.
“Note that because the elements of δC ℓℓ ′ mm ′ do not fall off very rapidly with increasing ℓ, there is hope to gather sufficient statistics to detect them, despite their being suppressed by roughly the size of the present-day curvature parameter; see e.g.[36].”
From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [36]
The Appendix A passage mentions correlations between different CMB multipoles, but does not describe how δC falls with increasing ℓ. Searches for its falloff, detectability, and suppression by the present-day curvature parameter found no passage addressing those claims. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe statistically anisotropic effects appear to extend to arbitrarily large multipole moments l.
“While this greatly constrains the size of these effects, they appear to extend to arbitrarily large ℓ, giving hope for statistically significant future detection [36].”
From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [36]
The Introduction discusses observed anomalies, including the alignment of the lowest multipoles. A passage indexed under Appendix A mentions correlations between different multipoles, but does not say that anisotropic effects extend to arbitrarily large ℓ. Searches for large multipoles and their detectability found no passage establishing that claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wald, R. M. (1983) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.2118 · Cited by 838
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 76
- 10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/310075 · DOI
- 10.1086/377226 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07409.x · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.023507 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.071301 · DOI
- 10.1086/444454 · DOI
- 10.1086/421007 · DOI
- 10.1086/421904 · DOI
- 10.1086/382267 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/421972 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08229.x · DOI
- 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1807 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.031301 · DOI
- 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/985 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.103529 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.063004 · DOI
- A. E. Gumrukcuoglu, 2008, Proceeding of the “11th Marcel Grossmann Meeting On General Relativity,”
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/11/005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/04/004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/045 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.103525 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.123520 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.083012 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.083507 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.103512 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.023007 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.124017 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.2380 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.105012 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.40.967 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/07/007 · DOI
- 10.1086/587451 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/021 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.063512 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.023531 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.111301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.2743 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/06/009 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/034 · DOI
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/119 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/013 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.063517 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/11/018 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.103524 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspa.1939.0140 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043543 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-Z · DOI · Paper page
- V. F. Mukhanov, 1985, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 41, 402
- V. F. Mukhanov, 1985, JETP Lett., 41, 493
- 10.1143/PTP.76.1036 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/07/025 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.083525 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/004 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.043519 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3258 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123532 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.065011 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.065012 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/015 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1025783118888 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.124030 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.04.008 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123535 · DOI
- 10.1088/0264-9381/26/17/175015 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/03/028 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/004 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/11/005 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.103509 · DOI
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/092 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.191302 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/08/025 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications
Heisenberg, L. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.006 · Cited by 419
“The encountered instabilities for some of these models make them cosmologically unviable [244].”
BackgroundObservable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation
Blanco-Pillado, J. J., & Salem, M. P. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/07/007 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Himmetoglu, B., Contaldi, C. R., & Peloso, M.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Physical Review D
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2009-12-28
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 12
- ISSN
- 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7998
- 1550-2368
- OpenAlex
- W2021394016
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 6.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- ghost instability, vector fields, perturbation equations, vacuum expectation value, FRW cosmology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review