Cited by 179Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ghost instabilities of cosmological models with vector fields nonminimally coupled to the curvature

Open access
Himmetoglu, Burak, Contaldi, Carlo R., Peloso, Marco·2009·Physical Review D

Abstract

We prove that many cosmological models characterized by vectors nonminimally coupled to the curvature (such as the Turner-Widrow mechanism for the production of magnetic fields during inflation, and models of vector inflation or vector curvaton) contain ghosts. The ghosts are associated with the longitudinal vector polarization present in these models and are found from studying the sign of the eigenvalues of the kinetic matrix for the physical perturbations. Ghosts introduce two main problems: (1) they make the theories ill defined at the quantum level in the high energy/subhorizon regime (and create serious problems for finding a well-behaved UV completion), and (2) they create an instability already at the linearized level. This happens because the eigenvalue corresponding to the ghost crosses zero during the cosmological evolution. At this point the linearized equations for the perturbations become singular (we show that this happens for all the models mentioned above). We explicitly solve the equations in the simplest cases of a vector without a vacuum expectation value in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker geometry, and of a vector with a vacuum expectation value plus a cosmological constant, and we show that indeed the solutions of the linearized equations diverge when these equations become singular.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevd.80.123530

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because the elements of δC_{ll'mm'} do not fall off very rapidly with increasing l, there is hope to gather sufficient statistics to detect them despite their suppression by the present-day curvature parameter.

    “Note that because the elements of δC ℓℓ ′ mm ′ do not fall off very rapidly with increasing ℓ, there is hope to gather sufficient statistics to detect them, despite their being suppressed by roughly the size of the present-day curvature parameter; see e.g.[36].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Appendix A passage mentions correlations between different CMB multipoles, but does not describe how δC falls with increasing ℓ. Searches for its falloff, detectability, and suppression by the present-day curvature parameter found no passage addressing those claims. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The statistically anisotropic effects appear to extend to arbitrarily large multipole moments l.

    “While this greatly constrains the size of these effects, they appear to extend to arbitrarily large ℓ, giving hope for statistically significant future detection [36].”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Introduction discusses observed anomalies, including the alignment of the lowest multipoles. A passage indexed under Appendix A mentions correlations between different multipoles, but does not say that anisotropic effects extend to arbitrarily large ℓ. Searches for large multipoles and their detectability found no passage establishing that claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. 10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1086/310075 · DOI
  3. 10.1086/377226 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07409.x · DOI
  6. 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.023507 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.071301 · DOI
  8. 10.1086/444454 · DOI
  9. 10.1086/421007 · DOI
  10. 10.1086/421904 · DOI
  11. 10.1086/382267 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1086/421972 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08229.x · DOI
  14. 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1807 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.031301 · DOI
  16. 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/985 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.103529 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.063004 · DOI
  19. A. E. Gumrukcuoglu, 2008, Proceeding of the “11th Marcel Grossmann Meeting On General Relativity,”
  20. 10.1088/1475-7516/2007/11/005 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/04/004 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/045 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.103525 · DOI
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.123520 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.083012 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.083507 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.103512 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.023007 · DOI
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.124017 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.2380 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.105012 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevD.40.967 · DOI
  33. 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/07/007 · DOI
  34. 10.1086/587451 · DOI
  35. 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/021 · DOI
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.063512 · DOI
  37. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.023531 · DOI
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.111301 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083502 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1103/PhysRevD.37.2743 · DOI
  41. 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/06/009 · DOI
  42. 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/034 · DOI
  43. 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/119 · DOI
  44. 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/013 · DOI
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.063517 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/11/018 · DOI
  47. 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.103524 · DOI
  48. 10.1098/rspa.1939.0140 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043543 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/0370-1573(92)90044-Z · DOI · Paper page
  52. V. F. Mukhanov, 1985, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 41, 402
  53. V. F. Mukhanov, 1985, JETP Lett., 41, 493
  54. 10.1143/PTP.76.1036 · DOI
  55. 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/07/025 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.083525 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/004 · DOI
  58. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.043519 · DOI
  59. 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3258 · DOI
  60. 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123532 · DOI
  61. 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.065011 · DOI
  62. 10.1103/PhysRevD.79.065012 · DOI
  63. 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/08/005 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/10/015 · DOI
  65. 10.1023/A:1025783118888 · DOI
  66. 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.124030 · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.04.008 · DOI
  68. 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123535 · DOI
  69. 10.1088/0264-9381/26/17/175015 · DOI
  70. 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/03/028 · DOI
  71. 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/004 · DOI
  72. 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/11/005 · DOI
  73. 10.1103/PhysRevD.80.103509 · DOI
  74. 10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/092 · DOI
  75. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.191302 · DOI
  76. 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/08/025 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Himmetoglu, B., Contaldi, C. R., & Peloso, M.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Physical Review D
Published
2009-12-28
Volume
80
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0556-2821 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-7998
  • 1550-2368
OpenAlex
W2021394016
Cited by
179
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
ghost instability, vector fields, perturbation equations, vacuum expectation value, FRW cosmology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review