Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pattern Recognition Techniques for Boson Sampling Validation

Agresti, Iris, Viggianiello, Niko, Flamini, Fulvio, Spagnolo, Nicolò, Crespi, Andrea, Osellame, Roberto, Wiebe, Nathan, Sciarrino, Fabio·2019·Physical Review X

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevx.9.011013

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The continuous-time quantum walk has been adopted to identify signature of bosonic coalescence, to simulate Fano resonance, to shed light on the interplay between quantum coherence and noise for assist transport processes in complex networks, and to quantum fast hitting on hexagonal graphs.

    “The continuous-time QW has been adopted to identify signature of bosonic coalescence [107], to simulate Fano resonance [108], to shed light on the interplay between quantum coherence and noise for assist transport processes in complex networks [40, 41, 109] ( Fig.5d ), and to quantum fast hitting on hexagonal graphs [110].”

    From Integrated photonic quantum technologies (2020) · cites this paper as [109]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1007/BF02650179 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.080501 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.040502 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.021010 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x · DOI · Paper page
  6. S. Aaronson, 2011, Proceedings of the Forty-third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
  7. 10.1126/science.1231692 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.102 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130503 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.152 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.100502 · DOI
  12. 10.1126/sciadv.1400255 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.130503 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.190501 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/nphoton.2017.63 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.230502 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.050504 · DOI
  18. S. Aaronson, 2014, Quantum Inf. Comput., 14, 1383, 10.26421/QIC14.15-16-7 · DOI
  19. N. Wiebe, 2014, Bull. EATCS, 112, 1
  20. 10.1038/ncomms9498 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.153603 · DOI
  22. 10.1142/S021974991560028X · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.scib.2018.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.123601 · DOI
  25. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/3/032001 · DOI
  26. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/4/041001 · DOI
  27. 10.1364/JOSAB.33.001835 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41566-018-0097-4 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1088/2058-9565/aa540c · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.240404 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1088/1367-2630/aaad92 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.020502 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.013811 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/ncomms10469 · DOI
  35. P. Simon, 2013, Too Big to Ignore: The Business Case for Big Data
  36. C. M. Bishop, 2006, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning
  37. K. P. Murphy, 2012, Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective
  38. L. Rokach, 2005, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook
  39. J. MacQueen, 1967, Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability
  40. E. W. Forgy, 1965, Biometrics, 21, 768
  41. 10.1109/TIT.1982.1056489 · DOI · Paper page
  42. P. Clifford, 2018, SODA ’18: Proceedings of the 29th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
  43. 10.1038/nphoton.2008.47 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/ncomms2616 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.012335 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Agresti, I., Viggianiello, N., Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., Crespi, A., Osellame, R., Wiebe, N., & Sciarrino, F.
Venue
Physical Review X
Published
2019-01-23
Volume
9
Issue
1
ISSN
2160-3308
Cited by
50
References
12
Language
en
Funders
  • H2020 European Research Council (307783, 742745)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (641039)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review