CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Optimal photonic indistinguishability tests in multimode networks

Viggianiello, Niko, Flamini, Fulvio, Bentivegna, Marco, Spagnolo, Nicolò, Crespi, Andrea, Brod, Daniel J., Galvão, Ernesto F., Osellame, Roberto, Sciarrino, Fabio·2018·Science Bulletin
DOI 10.1016/j.scib.2018.10.009
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scib.2018.10.009

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • First experimental demonstrations in bulk optics were reported in 2009 for the simulation of anyons and for the calculation of the energy spectrum of a hydrogen molecule.

    “First experimental demonstrations in bulk optics were reported in 2009 for the simulation of anyons, fractional-statistics particles responsible for the fractional quantum Hall effect [628,629] and for the calculation of the energy spectrum of a hydrogen molecule [630]”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [628]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Knill, 2001, A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics, Nature, 409, 46, 10.1038/35051009 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Spring, 2013, Boson sampling on a photonic chip, Science, 339, 798, 10.1126/science.1231692 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Tillmann, 2013, Experimental boson sampling, Nat Photonics, 7, 540, 10.1038/nphoton.2013.102 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Spagnolo, 2013, General rules for bosonic bunching in multimode interferometers, Phys Rev Lett, 111, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.130503 · DOI
  5. Carolan, 2014, On the experimental verification of quantum complexity in linear optics, Nat Photonics, 8, 621, 10.1038/nphoton.2014.152 · DOI
  6. Bentivegna, 2015, Experimental scattershot boson sampling, Sci Adv, 1, 10.1126/sciadv.1400255 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Loredo, 2017, Boson sampling with single-photon fock states from a bright solid-state source, Phys Rev Lett, 118, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.130503 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Wang, 2017, High-efficiency multiphoton boson sampling, Nat Photonics, 11, 361, 10.1038/nphoton.2017.63 · DOI
  9. He, 2017, Time-Bin-encoded boson sampling with a single-photon device, Phys Rev Lett, 118, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.190501 · DOI
  10. Aaronson, 2014, Boson sampling is far from uniform, Quan Inf Comput, 14, 1383
  11. Bentivegna, 2014, Bayesian approach to boson sampling validation, Int J Quant Inf, 12, 10.1142/S021974991560028X · DOI · Paper page
  12. Tichy, 2014, Stringent and efficient assessment of boson-sampling devices, Phys Rev Lett, 113, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.020502 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Crespi, 2016, Suppression law of quantum states in a 3D photonic fast fourier transform chip, Nat Commun, 7, 10469, 10.1038/ncomms10469 · DOI
  14. Liu, 2016, A certification scheme for the boson sampler, J Opt Soc Am B, 33, 1835, 10.1364/JOSAB.33.001835 · DOI
  15. Walschaers, 2016, Statistical benchmark for boson sampling, New J Phys, 18, 10.1088/1367-2630/18/3/032001 · DOI
  16. Bentivegna, 2016, Is my boson sampler working?, New J Phys, 18, 10.1088/1367-2630/18/4/041001 · DOI
  17. Shchesnovich, 2016, Universality of generalized bunching and efficient assessment of boson sampling, Phys Rev Lett, 116, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.123601 · DOI
  18. Wang, 2016, Chip-to-chip quantum photonic interconnect by path-polarization interconversion, Optica, 3, 407, 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000407 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Agresti I, Viggianiello N, Flamini F, et al. Pattern recognition techniques for boson sampling validation. arXiv:1712.06863, 2017. · arXiv
  20. Giordani, 2018, Experimental statistical signature of many-body quantum interference, Nat Photonics, 12, 173, 10.1038/s41566-018-0097-4 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Viggianiello, 2018, Experimental generalized quantum suppression law in Sylvester interferometers, New J Phys, 20, 10.1088/1367-2630/aaad92 · DOI
  22. Dittel, 2018, Totally destructive interference for permutation-symmetric many-particle states, Phys Rev A, 97, 062116, 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.062116 · DOI
  23. Aolita, 2015, Reliable quantum certification of photonic state preparations, Nat Commun, 6, 8498, 10.1038/ncomms9498 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Spring J, 2017, Chip-based array of near-identical, pure, heralded single-photon sources, Optica, 4, 90, 10.1364/OPTICA.4.000090 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Walborn, 2003, Multimode hong-ou-mandel interference, Phys Rev Lett, 90, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.143601 · DOI
  26. Sagioro, 2004, Time control of two-photon interference, Phys Rev A, 69, 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.053817 · DOI
  27. Spagnolo, 2013, Three-photon bosonic coalescence in an integrated tritter, Nat Commun, 4, 1606, 10.1038/ncomms2616 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Menssen, 2017, Distinguishability and many-particle interference, Phys Rev Lett, 118, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.153603 · DOI
  29. Agne, 2017, Observation of genuine three-photon Interference, Phys Rev Lett, 118, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.153602 · DOI
  30. Lund, 2014, Boson sampling from a gaussian state, Phys Rev Lett, 113, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.100502 · DOI
  31. Latmiral, 2016, Towards quantum supremacy with lossy scattershot boson sampling, New J Phys, 18, 10.1088/1367-2630/18/11/113008 · DOI
  32. Reck, 1994, Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator, Phys Rev Lett, 73, 58, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.58 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Crespi, 2015, Suppression laws for multiparticle interference in sylvester interferometers, Phys Rev A, 91, 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.013811 · DOI
  34. Osellame, 2003, Femtosecond writing of active optical waveguides with astigmatically shaped beams, J Opt Soc Am B, 20, 1559, 10.1364/JOSAB.20.001559 · DOI
  35. Della Valle, 2009, Micromachining of photonic devices by femtosecond laser pulses, J Opt A, 11, 10.1088/1464-4258/11/1/013001 · DOI
  36. Clements, 2016, Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers, Optica, 3, 1460, 10.1364/OPTICA.3.001460 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Flamini, 2017, Benchmarking integrated linear-optical architectures for quantum information processing, Sci Rep, 7, 15133, 10.1038/s41598-017-15174-2 · DOI
  38. Barak, 2007, Quantum fast fourier transform and quantum computation by linear optics, J Opt Soc Am B, 24, 231, 10.1364/JOSAB.24.000231 · DOI
  39. Miková, 2013, Carrying qubits with particles whose noninformational degrees of freedom are nonfactorable, Phys Rev A, 87, 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.042327 · DOI
  40. Pezzé, 2006, Phase sensitivity of a mach-zehnder interferometer, Phys Rev A, 73, 011801(R), 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.011801 · DOI
  41. Svore, 2014, Faster phase estimation, Quan Inf Comput, 14, 306
  42. Ding, 2016, On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-Unity indistinguishability from a resonantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar, Phys Rev Lett, 116, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.020401 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Somaschi, 2016, Near-optimal single-photon sources in the solid state, Nat Photonics, 10, 340, 10.1038/nphoton.2016.23 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Loredo, 2016, Scalable performance in solid-state single-photon sources, Optica, 3, 433, 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000433 · DOI
  45. Wang, 2016, Near-transform-limited single photons from an efficient solid-state quantum emitter, Phys Rev Lett, 116, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.213601 · DOI
  46. Harris, 2017, Quantum transport simulations in a programmable nanophotonic processor, Nat Photonics, 11, 447, 10.1038/nphoton.2017.95 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Viggianiello, N., Flamini, F., Bentivegna, M., Spagnolo, N., Crespi, A., Brod, D. J., Galvão, E. F., Osellame, R., & Sciarrino, F.
Venue
Science Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
63
Issue
22
Pages
1470-1478
ISSN
2095-9273
DOI
10.1016/j.scib.2018.10.009
Cited by
18
References
10
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review