The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying competitive customer value propositions in retailing
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a framework for identifying competitive customer value propositions in retailing. Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on existing literature on customer value and competitive advantage in order to form an understanding of the key dimensions of customer value, developing a hierarchical model of value propositions and establishing a link between customer value and competitive advantage. Findings: The work suggests a framework for identifying competitive customer value propositions (CVPs) where four hierarchical key dimensions of customer value – economic, functional, emotional, and symbolic – are first identified. In the second stage, a CVP is developed on the basis of these value dimensions. In the third stage, the CVP is evaluated for competitive advantage. It is proposed that economic and also functional CVPs are more likely to represent points of parity, whereas emotional and social CVPs represent points of difference for retail companies seeking differentiation from their competition and gaining of competitive advantage. Originality/value: Identifying competitive CVPs, the paper combines a hierarchical perspective on customer value and the concept of competitive advantage in a manner that offers managers a strategic positioning tool that links the customer's value needs to company resources and capabilities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298805200302 · Cited by 18,292
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Porter, M. E. (1985) · Cited by 14,701
The Core Competence of the Corporation
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (2006) · Strategische Unternehmungsplanung — Strategische Unternehmungsführung · doi:10.1007/3-540-30763-x_14 · Cited by 11,433
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun
Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208906 · Cited by 8,275
Consumer Perceived Value: The Development of a Multiple Item Scale
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00041-0 · Cited by 6,643
Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.20015 · Cited by 6,487
Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(00)00028-2 · Cited by 6,398
Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209376 · Cited by 6,020
Cited by
Chandler, J. D., & Lusch, R. F. (2015) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670514537709 · Cited by 549
The customer value proposition: evolution, development, and application in marketing
Payne, A., Frow, P., & Eggert, A. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0523-z · Cited by 440
A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept
Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090561111095676 · Cited by 424
Willems, K., Smolders, A., Brengman, M., Luyten, K., & Schöning, J. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.066 · Cited by 207
Toward a comprehensive framework of value proposition development: From strategy to implementation
Payne, A., Frow, P., Steinhoff, L., & Eggert, A. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.02.015 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Rintamäki, T., Kuusela, H., & Mitronen, L.
- Venue
- Managing Service Quality: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-11-20
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 621-634
- ISSN
- 0960-4529 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018810606
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying competitive customer value propositions in retailing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09604520710834975
- The paper
- Rintamäki, T., Kuusela, H., & Mitronen, L. (2007). Identifying competitive customer value propositions in retailing. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520710834975
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.