Cited by 205Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomyInnovation and Knowledge Management

Environmental munificence for entrepreneurs: entrepreneurial alertness and commitment

Tang, Jintong·2008·International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research

Abstract

Purpose Existing literature suggests that the need for a conducive environment is crucial in developing entrepreneurship. Previous research on this trend has focused on what constitutes a munificent environment and how environmental conditions stimulate an entrepreneur's intentionality to start a venture. However, little is known about how entrepreneurs “switch on” their alertness to business opportunities in a benign environment. The purpose of this paper is to examine the effects of environmental munificence on entrepreneurs' alertness, as moderated by self‐efficacy, and the effects of this alertness on entrepreneurs' commitment to their new ventures. Design/methodology/approach Data were used from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED) to test the hypotheses. Exploratory Factor Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were conducted to ensure the dimensionality of entrepreneurial commitment scale. Hypotheses were tested using moderated hierarchical regression analysis. Findings The results of this study show a strong relationship between environmental munificence and alertness especially when the entrepreneurs have high levels of self‐efficacy in performing the roles and tasks of new venture creation. In turn, entrepreneurial alertness is related to continuance, behavioral and affective commitment of entrepreneurs. Originality/value The findings have important implications for the theory and practice of developing entrepreneurial firms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13552550810874664

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, J.
Affiliations
Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Tang, Jintong
Venue
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2008-04-25
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
128-151
ISSN
1355-2554 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040792272
Cited by
205
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
environmental munificence, entrepreneurial alertness, entrepreneurial commitment, self-efficacy, startups, continuance commitment, affective commitment, behavioral commitment, business opportunity recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review