The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 68 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enterprise resource planning: An integrative review
Abstract
Enterprise resource planning (ERP) system solutions are currently in high demand by both manufacturing and service organisations because they provide a tightly integrated solution to an organisation's information system needs. During the last decade, ERP systems have received a significant amount of attention from researchers and practitioners from a variety of functional disciplines. In this paper, a comprehensive review of the research literature (1990‐2003) concerning ERP systems is presented. The literature is further classified and the major outcomes of each study are addressed and analysed. Following a comprehensive review of the literature, proposals for future research are formulated to identify topics where fruitful opportunities exist.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system.
Davenport, T. H. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 3,340
Enterprise resource planning: Implementation procedures and critical success factors
Umble, E. J., Haft, R. R., & Umble, M. M. (2003) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00547-7 · Cited by 1,607
Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems
Nah, F. F., Lau, J. L., & Kuang, J. (2001) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637150110392782 · Cited by 1,393
A critical success factors model for ERP implementation
Holland, C. P., & Light, B. (1999) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.765784 · Cited by 1,096
Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved
Markus, M. L., Axline, S., Petrie, D., & Tanis, C. (2000) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1080/02683960010008944 · Cited by 748
Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution?
Soh, C., Kien, S. S., & Tay-Yap, J. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332070 · Cited by 686
CULTURAL FITS AND MISFITS: IS ERP A UNIVERSAL SOLUTION?
Soh, C. (n.d.) · UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno · Cited by 670
A model of ERP project implementation
Parr, A., & Shanks, G. (2000) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1080/02683960010009051 · Cited by 572
Risk factors in enterprise-wide/ERP projects
Sumner, M. (2000) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/026839620001500407 · Cited by 559
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems
O’Leary, D. E. (2000) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805936 · Cited by 490
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Appleton, E.L. (1997), “How to survive ERP”,Datamation, pp. 50‐3.
- Sieber, T., Siau, K., Nah, F. and Sieber, M. (2000), “SAP implementation at the University of Nebraska: teaching case article”,Journal of Information Technology: Cases and Applications, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 41‐66.
- 10.1080/02683960010009079 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–802 of 802
Sap Netweaver jako platforma doskonalenia systemu ERP
Lenart, A. (2008)
Usability of ERP Error Messages
Sadiq, M., & Pirhonen, A. (2014) · Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)
Metadata
- Authors
- Shehab, E. M., Sharp, M. W., Supramaniam, L., & Spedding, T. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Greenwich (GB)
- ORCID
- Shehab, E.M.
- Venue
- Business Process Management Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 359-386
- ISSN
- 1463-7154 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1536465007
- Cited by
- 801
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 69
- FWCI
- 56.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Business Process Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Enterprise Management and Information Systems
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, integrated information systems, manufacturing organisations, service organizations, research agenda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
