CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 135Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingEmployee Performance and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The mediating effect of work engagement on innovative work behavior and the role of psychological well-being in the job demands–resources (JD-R) model.

Koroglu, Şennur, Ozmen, Omur·2022·Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration
DOI 10.1108/apjba-09-2020-0326
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: This study revisits the role of work engagement (WE) on innovative work behavior (IWB) in conjunction with the job demands–resources (JD-R) model, specifically examining its mediating role between antecedent variables of psychological well-being (PWB), interpersonal conflict (IPC) and perceived organizational support (POS). Design/methodology/approach: The study was conducted within five different sectors and 416 work settings in Turkey. A cross-sectional, correlational research design was used, and structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to test the mediating effect of WE. Findings: The results of the SEM provided partial support for eight hypotheses. The results of this study demonstrate a positive relationship between PWB, POS, WE and IWB. This indicates that resources are vital in increasing both WE and IWB. As expected, the correlation of IPC and IWB resulted in a negative relationship. The findings demonstrate a positive relationship between PWB and WE and IWB. Research limitations/implications: Extending the model, future research could incorporate the antecedents as mediators and utilize them to further explore the mechanisms of employee engagement (EE) and the IWB link. It would also be beneficial to include other variables such as personal differences, trust, personal environment fit, fairness in the workplace, recognition and organizational culture and employee value proposition as moderators of EE and IWB. Practical implications: The findings offer the suggestion of few practical applications such as the need to encourage organizations to enhance PWB to foster positive feelings in the work environment. This includes increasing employees' effort and dedication by utilizing POS in the workplace and considering employee's well-being. Additionally, EE should be an important organizational strategy to positively influence employee creativity within the workplace. Social implications: This research was conducted within the Turkish business context; it would be worthwhile to validate the findings of this study in a multicultural context that did not share similar basic characteristics as those in Turkey. There could be a comparative study of EE between Turkey and other countries as a cross-cultural investigation. Originality/value: The results of data analysis have revealed an enhanced understanding of the role of the mediation effect of WE on IWBs. This study also expands the concept that psychological well-being can enhance WE, which in turn corresponds to more IWB in the context of the JD-R model. The findings indicate that in order to better comprehend its function, IPC needs to be further examined with other antecedents.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/apjba-09-2020-0326

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 2020, Does thriving and trust in the leader explain the link between transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour? A cross-sectional survey, Journal of Research in Nursing, 25, 37, 10.1177/1744987119880583 · DOI
  2. 2012, Linking LMX, innovative work behavior and turnover intentions, Career Development International, 17, 208, 10.1108/13620431211241063 · DOI
  3. 2011, A meta-analysis of burnout with job demands, resources, and attitudes, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 549, 10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.007 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2018, Effects of perceived organizational support on organizational citizenship behavior–sequential mediation by well-being and work engagement, Journal of the Punjab University Historical Society, 31, 111
  5. 1997, Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do, California Management Review, 40, 39, 10.2307/41165921 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 1988, Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended a two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103
  7. 2007, Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 274, 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 1994, Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming
  9. 2010, Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test
  10. 2007, How leaders influence employees' innovative behavior, European Journal of Innovation Management, 10, 41, 10.1108/14601060710720546 · DOI
  11. 2003, The DISC model: demand-induced strain compensation mechanisms in job stress, 57
  12. 1990, Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51, 10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51 · DOI
  13. 1997, Perceived organizational support, discretionary treatment, and job satisfaction, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 812, 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.812 · DOI
  14. 2002, Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565, 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565 · DOI
  15. 2014, The Role of Employee Engagement in Revitalizing Creativity and Innovation at the Workplace: A Survey of Selected Libraries in Meru County--Kenya
  16. 1960, The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement, American Sociological Review, 25, 161, 10.2307/2092623 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 2010, Multivariate Data Analysis
  18. 2005, How dentists cope with their job demands and stay engaged: the moderating role of job resources, European Journal of Oral Sciences, 113, 479, 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00250.x · DOI
  19. 2015, Trends in Global Employee Engagement: Making Engagement Happen
  20. 1997, Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: a cognitive-energetical framework, Biological Psychology, 45, 73, 10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05223-4 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 2001, Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations
  22. 2012, Shaping environments conducive to creativity: the role of intrinsic motivation, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 53, 53, 10.1177/1938965511424725 · DOI
  23. 2021, Towards teacher innovative work behavior: a conceptual model, Cogent Education, 8, 1869364, 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1869364 · DOI
  24. 2007, A review of employee well‐being and innovativeness: an opportunity for a mutual benefit, Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 299, 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00442.x · DOI
  25. 2000, Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behavior, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287, 10.1348/096317900167038 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 2004, How fairness perceptions make the innovative behavior stressful, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 201, 10.1002/job.238 · DOI
  27. 2018, Workplace aggression and organisational effectiveness: the mediating role of employee engagement, Australian Journal of Management, 43, 614, 10.1177/0312896218768378 · DOI
  28. 1990, Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692, 10.2307/256287 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 1988, Three tiers for innovation research, Communication Research, 15, 509, 10.1177/009365088015005001 · DOI
  30. 1978, The Social Psychology of Organizations
  31. 2019, Test of the job demand resources model in Thailand, International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 22, 2, 10.1108/IJOTB-03-2018-0036 · DOI
  32. 2020, An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: revisiting the JD-R model, Human Resource Management Review, 30, 100704, 10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100704 · DOI
  33. 2014, The role of weekly high‐activated positive mood, context, and personality in innovative work behavior: a multilevel and interactional model, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 234, 10.1002/job.1867 · DOI
  34. 1988, Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391, 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391 · DOI
  35. 1996, MBI: Maslach Burnout Inventory
  36. 2004, The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work, Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 77
  37. 1998, Psychological aspects of workload
  38. 2014, The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict
  39. 1989, Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models, Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430, 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430 · DOI
  40. 2010, Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance, Academy of Management Journal, 53, 617, 10.5465/amj.2010.51468988 · DOI
  41. 2010, Full engagement: the integration of employee engagement and psychological well‐being, Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 31, 324, 10.1108/01437731011043348 · DOI
  42. 2002, The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71, 10.1023/A:1015630930326 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 2013, What is engagement?, 29
  44. 1994, Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580, 10.2307/256701 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 2011, Empowering leadership and the influence of a humorous work climate on service employees' creativity and innovative behavior in frontline service jobs, International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 3, 267, 10.1108/17566691111182834 · DOI
  46. 2011, The differential effects of interpersonal conflict from customers and coworkers: trait anger as a moderator, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 424, 10.1037/a0023874 · DOI
  47. 2008, Conflict, health, and well-being, 267
  48. 1998, Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3, 356, 10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.356 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 2018, The impact of transformational leadership on employees' creativity: the mediating role of perceived organizational support, Management Research Review, 41, 113, 10.1108/MRR-02-2017-0032 · DOI
  50. 2012, Work engagement as a mediator between job characteristics and positive and negative extra-role behaviors, Career Development International, 17, 188, 10.1108/13620431211241054 · DOI
  51. 2020, Perceived organizational support and employee innovation behavior based on intermediary role of multiple identities, HRD Journal, 11, 52
  52. 1996, Innovation in top management teams, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680, 10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680 · DOI
  53. 2003, Affect, psychological well-being and creativity: results of a field study, Journal of Business and Management, 9, 21
  54. 2007, The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model, International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 121, 10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.121 · DOI
  55. 2010, Innovative behavior in the workplace: the role of performance and image outcome expectations, Academy of Management Journal, 53, 323, 10.5465/amj.2010.49388995 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 135

Metadata

Authors
Koroglu, Ş., & Ozmen, O.
Affiliations
Dokuz Eylül University (TR)
ORCID
Koroglu, Şennur
Venue
Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2021-08-25
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
124-144
ISSN
1757-4323 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/apjba-09-2020-0326
OpenAlex
W3193468714
Cited by
135
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
15.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations
Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Management
Keywords
work engagement, innovative behavior, psychological well-being, job demands-resources model, interpersonal conflict, perceived organizational support, mediating effect, employee creativity, employee well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review