Impact of AI regulation on intention to use robots: From citizens and government perspective
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the factors influencing the citizens to use robots that would improve the quality of life of the citizens. Design/methodology/approach With the help of different adoption theories and models and with the support of background studies, some hypotheses have been formulated and a conceptual model has been developed with the consideration of the impact of artificial intelligence regulation (IAR) that controls the use of robots as a moderator. The model has been validated and the hypotheses have been tested by statistical analysis with the help of survey works involving consideration of feedbacks from 503 usable respondents. Findings The study reveals that the use of robots by the citizens would appreciably increase if government imposes strict artificial intelligence (AI) regulatory control concerning the use of robots, and in that case, it appears that the use of robots would improve the quality of life of the citizens. Research limitations/implications The duly validated model would help the authority to appropriately nurse and nurture the factors such as ethical dilemma, perceived risks and control beliefs for enhancing the intention of the citizens to use robots for many purposes including domestic usage in the context of appropriate restrictions imposed through AI regulation. Such use of robots would eventually improve the quality of life. Originality/value There are a few studies covering analysis of IAR as a moderator on the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Un estudio plantea que el uso de robots aumentaría apreciablemente si el Gobierno impusiera un estricto control de inteligencia artificial y que el uso de estos robots mejoraría la calidad de vida de los ciudadanos.
“Al respecto, Chatterjee (2020) revela un estudio donde plantea que el uso de robots aumentaría apreciablemente si el Gobierno impusiera un estricto control de inteligencia artificial (IA) y que el uso de estos robots mejoraría la calidad de vida de los ciudadanos.”
From Hacia una normativa sobre la inteligencia artificial (IA): consideraciones clave y regulaciones internacionales (2024) · cites this paper as Chatterjee (2020)
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159 · see citing works
Texas A&M International University, Kock, N., Lynn, G., & Stevens Institute of Technology (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00302 · Cited by 3,783 · see citing works
Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013)
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114526928 · Cited by 3,332 · see citing works
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282485 · Cited by 2,454 · see citing works
Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011) · Advances in International Marketing · doi:10.1108/s1474-7979(2011)0000022012 · Cited by 1,326 · see citing works
Ten Steps in Scale Development and Reporting: A Guide for Researchers
Carpenter, S. (2018) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583 · Cited by 1,141 · see citing works
The influence of perceived value on purchase intention in social commerce context
Gan, C., & Wang, W. (2017) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-06-2016-0164 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
de Graaf, M. M. A., Allouch, S. B., & Klamer, T. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.030 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Flandorfer, P. (2012) · International Journal of Population Research · doi:10.1155/2012/829835 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy
Solaiman, S. M. (2017) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-016-9192-3 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bustillos Ortega, O., Murillo Gamboa, J., Núñez Peralta, O., & Rodríguez Sibaja, F. (2024) · Interfases · doi:10.26439/interfases2024.n020.7178 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Al respecto, Chatterjee (2020) revela un estudio donde plantea que el uso de robots aumentaría apreciablemente si el Gobierno impusiera un estricto control de inteligencia artificial (IA) y que el uso de estos robots mejoraría la calidad de vida de los ciudadanos.”
- Authors
- Chatterjee, S.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Chatterjee, Sheshadri
- Venue
- International Journal of Intelligent Unmanned Systems
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2019-12-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-114
- ISSN
- 2049-6427 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2995844687
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 7.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Intelligent Unmanned Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Keywords
- AI regulation, robot adoption, quality of life, ethical dilemmas, risk perception, control beliefs, home robots, adoption theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
