Cited by 89Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionDigital Communication and LanguageImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Online disinhibition: conceptualization, measurement, and implications for online deviant behavior

Cheung, Christy M.K., Wong, Randy Yee Man, Chan, Tommy K.H.·2020·Industrial Management & Data Systems

Abstract

Purpose Online disinhibition is one of the key factors leading to the occurrence of cyberaggression, cyberbullying and various forms of deviant behaviors in the online environment. To understand the composition of online disinhibition, this study aims to conceptualize online disinhibition and develop a measurement instrument for online disinhibition. Design/methodology/approach We followed a rigorous procedure to develop and validate the multidimensional instrument of online disinhibition in three phases: item generation, measurement development and instrument testing. Findings We developed a 23-item online disinhibition scale and identified six key dimensions: dissociative anonymity, invisibility, asynchronicity, solipsistic introjections, dissociative imagination and minimization of authority. Practical implications The online disinhibition instrument is an accessible and easily administered measure that can be used as a checklist for systems designers and administrators to evaluate the level of online disinhibition among users. It offers systems design information on how to prevent and combat online deviant behaviors on platforms. Originality/value This work provides a rich conceptualization of an online disinhibition instrument that can serve as a springboard for future work to understand online deviant behaviors. The newly developed measurement instrument of online disinhibition also adds to the repository of rigorous research scales in this area.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/imds-08-2020-0509

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheung, C. M. K., Wong, R. Y. M., & Chan, T. K. H.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • NEOMA Business School (FR)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
Venue
Industrial Management & Data Systems
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-10-22
Volume
121
Issue
1
Pages
48-64
ISSN
0263-5577 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094143515
Cited by
89
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Industrial Management & Data Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
online disinhibition effect, cyberbullying, online aggression, invisibility, asynchrony, scale development, measurement instruments, digital platforms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review