Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,976

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global contrast based salient region detection

Cheng, Ming-Ming, Zhang, Guo-Xin, Mitra, Niloy J., Huang, Xiaolei, Hu, Shi-Min·2011·CVPR 2011

Abstract

Automatic estimation of salient object regions across images, without any prior assumption or knowledge of the contents of the corresponding scenes, enhances many computer vision and computer graphics applications. We introduce a regional contrast based salient object detection algorithm, which simultaneously evaluates global contrast differences and spatial weighted coherence scores. The proposed algorithm is simple, efficient, naturally multi-scale, and produces full-resolution, high-quality saliency maps. These saliency maps are further used to initialize a novel iterative version of GrabCut, namely SaliencyCut, for high quality unsupervised salient object segmentation. We extensively evaluated our algorithm using traditional salient object detection datasets, as well as a more challenging Internet image dataset. Our experimental results demonstrate that our algorithm consistently outperforms 15 existing salient object detection and segmentation methods, yielding higher precision and better recall rates. We also show that our algorithm can be used to efficiently extract salient object masks from Internet images, enabling effective sketch-based image retrieval (SBIR) via simple shape comparisons. Despite such noisy internet images, where the saliency regions are ambiguous, our saliency guided image retrieval achieves a superior retrieval rate compared with state-of-the-art SBIR methods, and additionally provides important target object region information.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995344

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. koch, 1985, Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry, Human Neurobiology, 4, 219
  2. 10.1109/34.730558 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1364/JOSAA.23.002462 · doi:10.1364/josaa.23.002462
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01568.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383267 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2010.01792.x · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2010.01792.x
  7. 10.1109/TCSVT.2005.859028 · DOI · Paper page
  8. harel, 2006, Graph-based visual saliency, NIPS, 545
  9. 10.1023/B:VISI.0000022288.19776.77 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539929 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1145/957013.957094 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383047 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.02.020 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00097-7 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1145/1015706.1015720 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1109/CVPR.2004.1315142 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1146/annurev.ps.06.020155.001411 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1145/1409060.1409071 · doi:10.1145/1409060.1409071
  20. 10.1109/ICIP.2009.5413815 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206596 · DOI · Paper page
  22. eihhauser, 2003, Does luminance-constrast contribute to a saliency map for overt visual attention?, European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1089, 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02508.x · DOI
  23. 10.1007/978-3-540-79547-6_7 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1145/1882261.1866185 · DOI
  25. 10.1145/566570.566650 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1109/30.920468 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1145/1180639.1180824 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1145/1778765.1778848 · doi:10.1145/1778765.1778848
  29. zeki, 1999, Inner Vision An Exploration of Art and the Brain
  30. 10.1145/1618452.1618505 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s00371-010-0448-8 · doi:10.1007/s00371-010-0448-8

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, M.-M., Zhang, G.-X., Mitra, N. J., Huang, X., & Hu, S.-M.
Venue
CVPR 2011
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-06
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
409-416
OpenAlex
W2037954058
Cited by
2,976
References
4
FWCI
141.81
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.