Cited by 27Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Optimization of visual information presentation for visual prosthesis

Open access
Guo, Fei, Yang, Yuan, Gao, Yong·2018·International Journal of Biomedical Imaging

Abstract

Visual prosthesis applying electrical stimulation to restore visual function for the blind has promising prospects. However, due to the low resolution, limited visual field, and the low dynamic range of the visual perception, huge loss of information occurred when presenting daily scenes. The ability of object recognition in real-life scenarios is severely restricted for prosthetic users. To overcome the limitations, optimizing the visual information in the simulated prosthetic vision has been the focus of research. This paper proposes two image processing strategies based on a salient object detection technique. The two processing strategies enable the prosthetic implants to focus on the object of interest and suppress the background clutter. Psychophysical experiments show that techniques such as foreground zooming with background clutter removal and foreground edge detection with background reduction have positive impacts on the task of object recognition in simulated prosthetic vision. By using edge detection and zooming technique, the two processing strategies significantly improve the recognition accuracy of objects. We can conclude that the visual prosthesis using our proposed strategy can assist the blind to improve their ability to recognize objects. The results will provide effective solutions for the further development of visual prosthesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2018/3198342

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other features included contrast information, semantic information, depth information, surface normal, convolutional filters, and the use of clip-art style images.

    “Other features included contrast information,73,76 semantic information,80,82,83 depth information,76,79,81 surface normal,84 convolutional filters,73,75,77 and the use of clip-art style images.85,86”

    From Visual Prostheses in the Era of Artificial Intelligence Technology (2025) · cites this paper as [80]

    Section 2.4 describes a strategy that enhances contrast between the main object and the background, supporting the contrast-information part of the sentence. The cited paper does not substantiate the listed uses of semantic information, depth information, surface normals, convolutional filters, or clip-art-style images. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Due to the complexity of saliency calculation, real-time performance is the limiting factor for visual prostheses.

    “However, due to the complexity of saliency calculation, real-time performance is the limiting factor for visual prostheses [185][186][187][188].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [16]Harel J. Koch C. Perona P. Graph-based visual saliency Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS '06) December 2006 545 552 2-s2.0-84864037603
  2. [18]Zhou D. Weston J. Gretton A. Bousquet O. Scholkopf B. Ranking on data manifolds Advances In NIPS 2003 Ranking on data manifolds. Advances In NIPS B. Scholkopf 169 176

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, F., Yang, Y., & Gao, Y.
Affiliations
Xi'an University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Yuan
Venue
International Journal of Biomedical Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018
Volume
2018
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 1687-4188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-4196
OpenAlex
W2791016185
Cited by
27
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Biomedical Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Funds Youth Science Fund Project (61102017, 12JK0499)
  • Education Department of Shaanxi Province (61102017, 12JK0499)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
visual prosthesis, electrical stimulation, visual information presentation, salient object detection, object recognition, blinds, edge detection, zooming, background clutter removal, simulated prosthetic vision

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review