Cited by 146Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignLow-power high-performance VLSI design

A Low-Power 32-Channel Digitally Programmable Neural Recording Integrated Circuit

Wattanapanitch, Woradorn, Sarpeshkar, Rahul·2011·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems

Abstract

We report the design of an ultra-low-power 32-channel neural-recording integrated circuit (chip) in a 0.18 μ m CMOS technology. The chip consists of eight neural recording modules where each module contains four neural amplifiers, an analog multiplexer, an A/D converter, and a serial programming interface. Each amplifier can be programmed to record either spikes or LFPs with a programmable gain from 49-66 dB. To minimize the total power consumption, an adaptive-biasing scheme is utilized to adjust each amplifier's input-referred noise to suit the background noise at the recording site. The amplifier's input-referred noise can be adjusted from 11.2 μVrms (total power of 5.4 μW) down to 5.4 μVrms (total power of 20 μW) in the spike-recording setting. The ADC in each recording module digitizes the a.c. signal input to each amplifier at 8-bit precision with a sampling rate of 31.25 kS/s per channel, with an average power consumption of 483 nW per channel, and, because of a.c. coupling, allows d.c. operation over a wide dynamic range. It achieves an ENOB of 7.65, resulting in a net efficiency of 77 fJ/State, making it one of the most energy-efficient designs for neural recording applications. The presented chip was successfully tested in an in vivo wireless recording experiment from a behaving primate with an average power dissipation per channel of 10.1 μ W. The neural amplifier and the ADC occupy areas of 0.03 mm(2) and 0.02 mm(2) respectively, making our design simultaneously a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbcas.2011.2163404

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another power-scheduling method is to adapt each amplifier channel's current consumption according to the background noise at its respective electrode.

    “Therefore, another power-scheduling method is to adapt the current consumption of each amplifier channel according to the background noise present at the respective electrode [17, 122, 141].”
  • The folded cascode OTA is the natural choice for front-end amplifiers operating below 3 V and requiring low NEF and PEF values.

    “Instead, the folded cascode OTA (Fig. 5d) is the natural choice for front-end amplifiers operating at supply voltages below 3 V and requiring low NEF and PEF values [103, 141, 142].”
  • Wattanapanitch et al. proposed an NEF optimization scheme for low-voltage neural amplifiers using the folded cascode OTA, which was adopted in later studies.

    “Wattanapanitch et al. [142] further proposed an NEF optimization scheme for low-voltage neural amplifiers implemented using the folded cascode OTA, which were adopted in later studies [103, 141].”
  • Recent works reported that careful design of the OTA A1 makes low current consumption and low input-referred noise easily achievable.

    “Recent works have also reported that by carefully designing the OTA A1, low current consumption and low input-referred noise are easily achievable [63, 141, 142, 156].”
  • Wattanapanitch and Sarpeshkar partitioned an IC neural amplifier into two voltage domains, with front-end amplifiers at 1.8 V and the ADC and backend digital blocks at 1 V to reduce dynamic switching power.

    “For example, the IC neural amplifier reported by Wattanapanitch and Sarpeshkar [141] was partitioned into two separate voltage domains. The front-end amplifiers operated at 1.8 V, while the supply voltage of the ADC and the backend digital blocks were reduced to 1 V to decrease the dynamic switching power.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wattanapanitch, W., & Sarpeshkar, R.
Affiliations
  • Kasetsart University (TH)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems
Published
2011-12
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
592-602
ISSN
  • 1932-4545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-9990
OpenAlex
W2061752509
Cited by
146
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 8
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Keywords
neural amplifier, adaptive biasing, input-referred noise, spike recording, local field potentials, analog-to-digital converter, energy-efficient ADC, CMOS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review