Cited by 62Wireless Power Transfer SystemsNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringWireless Body Area Networks

EnerCage: A Smart Experimental Arena With Scalable Architecture for Behavioral Experiments

Open access
Jow, Uei-Ming, McMenamin, Peter, Kiani, Mehdi, Manns, Joseph R., Ghovanloo, Maysam·2014·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Wireless power, when coupled with miniaturized implantable electronics, has the potential to provide a solution to several challenges facing neuroscientists during basic and preclinical studies with freely behaving animals. The EnerCage system is one such solution as it allows for uninterrupted electrophysiology experiments over extended periods of time and vast experimental arenas, while eliminating the need for bulky battery payloads or tethering. It has a scalable array of overlapping planar spiral coils (PSCs) and three-axis magnetic sensors for focused wireless power transmission to devices on freely moving subjects. In this paper, we present the first fully functional EnerCage system, in which the number of PSC drivers and magnetic sensors was reduced to one-third of the number used in our previous design via multicoil coupling. The power transfer efficiency (PTE) has been improved to 5.6% at a 120 mm coupling distance and a 48.5 mm lateral misalignment (worst case) between the transmitter (Tx) array and receiver (Rx) coils. The new EnerCage system is equipped with an Ethernet backbone, further supporting its modular/scalable architecture, which, in turn, allows experimental arenas with arbitrary shapes and dimensions. A set of experiments on a freely behaving rat were conducted by continuously delivering 20 mW to the electronics in the animal headstage for more than one hour in a powered 3538 cm(2) experimental area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2013.2278180

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because non-human primates need large roaming areas, the short-range wireless power methods used for rodents are inadequate for powering their neural recording systems.

    “Due to the large roaming space required by NHPs, the short-range wireless power harvesting methods described for rodents, such as in [67] and [64], are not sufficient to wirelessly power neural recording systems for NHP studies.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [24]OET Bulletin 65: Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields 8 1997 Federal Commun. Commission Washington, DC, USA
  2. [31]Waffenschmidt E Staring T Limitation of inductive power transfer for consumer applications 9 2009 1 10 Proc. Eur. Conf. Power Electron. Appl.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jow, U.-M., McMenamin, P., Kiani, M., Manns, J. R., & Ghovanloo, M.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Ghovanloo, Maysam
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2014-01
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
139-148
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2037492536
Cited by
62
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R21EB009437)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
wireless power transfer, implantable electronics, freely moving animals, planar spiral coil, magnetic sensors, power transfer efficiency, rat behavior, scalable architecture
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Equipment Design, Male, Miniaturization, Neurosciences, Electric Power Supplies, Telemetry, User-Computer Interface, Prostheses and Implants, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats, Wireless Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review