Cited by 236Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCryptography and Data Security

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Trustworthy Privacy Preserving Framework for Machine Learning in Industrial IoT Systems

Arachchige, Pathum Chamikara Mahawaga, Bertok, Peter, Khalil, Ibrahim, Liu, Dongxi, Camtepe, Seyit, Atiquzzaman, Mohammed·2020·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Abstract

Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) is revolutionizing many leading industries such as energy, agriculture, mining, transportation, and healthcare. IIoT is a major driving force for Industry 4.0, which heavily utilizes machine learning (ML) to capitalize on the massive interconnection and large volumes of IIoT data. However, ML models that are trained on sensitive data tend to leak privacy to adversarial attacks, limiting its full potential in Industry 4.0. This article introduces a framework named PriModChain that enforces privacy and trustworthiness on IIoT data by amalgamating differential privacy, federated ML, Ethereum blockchain, and smart contracts. The feasibility of PriModChain in terms of privacy, security, reliability, safety, and resilience is evaluated using simulations developed in Python with socket programming on a general-purpose computer. We used Ganache_v2.0.1 local test network for the local experiments and Kovan test network for the public blockchain testing. We verify the proposed security protocol using Scyther_v1.1.3 protocol verifier.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tii.2020.2974555

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. dwork, 0, The differential privacy frontier, Proc Theory Cryptography Conf, 496

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Arachchige, P. C. M., Bertok, P., Khalil, I., Liu, D., Camtepe, S., & Atiquzzaman, M.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Published
2020-09
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
6092-6102
ISSN
  • 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0050
OpenAlex
W3008569902
Cited by
236
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 12
FWCI
34.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
Industrial Internet of Things, privacy preservation, differential privacy, federated learning, Ethereum, smart contracts, adversarial attacks, Industry 4.0, security protocol verification, Scyther, Ganache

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review