Cited by 277Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of portable FES-based neural orthoses for the correction of drop foot

Lyons, G.M., Sinkjaer, T., Burridge, J.H., Wilcox, D.J.·2002·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

This paper reviews the technological developments in neural orthoses for the correction of upper motor neurone drop foot since 1961, when the technique was first proposed by Liberson and his co-workers. Drop foot stimulator (DFS) developments are reviewed starting with hard-wired single-channel and multichannel surface functional electrical stimulation (FES) systems, followed by implanted drop foot stimulators, and then continuing with microprocessor-based surface and implanted drop foot stimulators. The review examines the role of artificial and "natural" sensors as replacements for the foot-switch as the primary control sensor in drop foot stimulators. DFS systems incorporating real-time control of FES and completely implanted DFS systems finish the review.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2002.806832

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Acimovic, A comparative study of the functionality of the second generation of peroneal stimulators, 621
  2. Bogataj, Gait pattern behavior of hemiplegic patients under the influence of a six-channel microprocessor stimulator in a real environment, 529
  3. Bowman, Effects of stimulus pulse duration on comfort during controlled motor contractions, 429
  4. Burridge, Clinical results of a preliminary investigation into the use of two channel stimulation to improve the quality of walking of patients with established hemiplegia, 8
  5. Creasey, Clinical neural prostheses beyond 2000, 517
  6. Dimitrijevic, 1968, Electronic control of paralyzed extremities, Bio-med. Eng., 8
  7. Ewins, The Compustim 10b electrical stimulator, 6
  8. Hourigan, 1999, Joint angle and acceleration analysis using integrated accelerometers, J. Bone Joint Surg. [BR], 81-B, 88
  9. Jeglic, Electrical stimulation of skeletal muscle by directly powered implanted R.F. receivers, 42
  10. Jeglic, Implantable muscle/nerve stimulator as part of an electronic brace, 593
  11. Karsznia, 1990, Why patients use or reject a peroneal muscle stimulator?, 251
  12. Kelih, 1988, Dual channel implantable stimulator, 127
  13. Kralj, 1971, Improvement in locomotion in hemiplegic patients with multichannel electrical stimulation, 45
  14. Leane, 1998, The incidence of drop foot following stroke in the St. Camillus’ Hospital catchment area within the Mid-Western Health Board, Ir. J. Med. Sc., 167, 275
  15. Lyons, The University of Limerick Drop Foot Stimulator, 68
  16. Lyons, Evaluation of a drop foot stimulator FES intensity envelope matched to tibialis anterior muscle activity during walking, 448
  17. McNeal, The effect of peripheral nerve implanted electrical stimulation on motor control in stroke patients
  18. Mourselas, Correction of drop foot using a fuzzy logic controlled miniature stimulator, 456
  19. Pedersen, 1986, Videnskab og Praksis—Original Meddelelse—Klinisk erfaring med en ny dropfodstimulator—Clinical experience with new peroneal stimulator, Ugeskrift for Laeger, 148, 1272
  20. Popovic, Programmable and portable electrical stimulator for transcutaneous FES applications—Complex motion, 238
  21. Prochazka, 1983, Electrical stimulation of paretic leg muscles in man, allowing feedback controlled movements to be generated from the wrist, J. Physiol., 343, 20P
  22. Schuck, 1973, Developing clinical devices for hemiplegic stroke patients, 535
  23. Sweeney, 1999, Fuzzy gait event detection in a Finite State Controlled FES Drop Foot Correction System, J. Bone Joint Surg. [BR], 81-B, 93
  24. Symons, Trigger switches for implantable gait stimulation, 319
  25. Taylor, Correction of bi-lateral dropped foot using the Odstock 2 Channel Stimulator (O2CHS)
  26. Taylor, 2000, IMPULSE Questionnaire, Salisbury FES Newslett., 10
  27. Vodovnik, Electronic walking aids for patients with peroneal palsy, 58

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 277

Metadata

Authors
Lyons, G. M., Sinkjaer, T., Burridge, J. H., & Wilcox, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Limerick (IE)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2002-12
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
260-279
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W2165067332
Cited by
277
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
foot drop, functional electrical stimulation, upper motor neuron lesion, surface stimulation
MeSH terms
Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Equipment Design, Foot, Humans, Microelectrodes, Miniaturization, Orthotic Devices, Peroneal Nerve, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Transducers, Muscle, Skeletal, Gait Disorders, Neurologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review