Cited by 213Teleoperation and Haptic SystemsTactile and Sensory InteractionsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Perception-Based Data Reduction and Transmission of Haptic Data in Telepresence and Teleaction Systems

Hinterseer, Peter, Hirche, Sandra, Chaudhuri, Subhasis, Steinbach, Eckehard, Buss, Martin·2008·IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing

Abstract

We present a novel approach for the transmission of haptic data in telepresence and teleaction systems. The goal of this work is to reduce the packet rate between an operator and a teleoperator without impairing the immersiveness of the system. Our approach exploits the properties of human haptic perception and is, more specifically, based on the concept of just noticeable differences. In our scheme, updates of the haptic amplitude values are signaled across the network only if the change of a haptic stimulus is detectable by the human operator. We investigate haptic data communication for a 1 degree-of-freedom (DoF) and a 3 DoF teleaction system. Our experimental results show that the presented approach is able to reduce the packet rate between the operator and teleoperator by up to 90% of the original rate without affecting the performance of the system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsp.2007.906746

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kaber et al. show that latency should be less than 25 ms for accurately completing haptic operations.

    “As for haptic feedback, Kaber et al. [21], [22] show that latency should be less than 25 ms for accurately completing haptic operations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinterseer, P., Hirche, S., Chaudhuri, S., Steinbach, E., & Buss, M.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
  • Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing
Published
2008-02
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
588-597
ISSN
1053-587X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160966687
Cited by
213
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 19
FWCI
29.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace (IIT Bombay) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
telepresence, just noticeable difference, haptic perception, teleoperation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review