Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 661

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Taboo Trade‐offs: Reactions to Transactions That Transgress the Spheres of Justice

Fiske, Alan Page, Tetlock, Philip E.·1997·Political Psychology
DOI 10.1111/0162-895x.00058
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Taboo trade‐offs violate deeply held normative intuitions about the integrity, even sanctity, of certain relationships and the moral‐political values underlying those relationships. For instance, if asked to estimate the monetary worth of one's children, of one's loyalty to one's country, or of acts of friendship, people find the questions more than merely confusing or cognitively intractable: they find such questions themselves morally offensive. This article draws on Fiske's relational theory and Tetlock's value pluralism model: (a) to identify the conditions under which people are likely to treat trade‐offs as taboo; (b) to describe how people collectively deal with trade‐offs that become problematic; (c) to specify the conceptual components of moral outrage and the factors that affect the intensity of reactions to various explicit trade‐offs; (d) to explore the various strategies that decision‐makers—required by resource scarcity and institutional roles to confront taboo trade‐offs—use to deflect the wrath of censorious observers; (e) to offer a method of dispute resolution based on pluralism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/0162-895x.00058

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Fiske, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E.
Venue
Political Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
255-297
ISSN
  • 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9221
DOI
10.1111/0162-895x.00058
OpenAlex
W2156485215
Cited by
661
References
2
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.