Cited by 420Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesEarly Childhood Education and Development

Socioeconomic status and cognitive functioning: moving from correlation to causation

Duncan, Greg J., Magnuson, Katherine·2012·WIREs Cognitive Science

Abstract

A growing body of cognitive research uses sophisticated behavioral and neuroimaging measurements to demonstrate associations between family socioeconomic status (SES) and specific cognitive functions. We argue for the value in these kinds of studies of increased sophistication in the measurement and modeling of SES. With regard to measurement, SES combines several components, each of which represents distinct resources that might benefit children's cognitive development in different ways. Policy implications of studies using omnibus SES composites are problematic because there are no ‘treatments’ for enhancing overall SES, although policies abound for enhancing specific components of SES such as family income. Past literature offers guidance regarding how best to measure each of the SES components. With regard to modeling, we point out that the manipulability of economic, educational, and occupational components of SES varies, which provides opportunities for generating experimental or quasi‐experimental variation in some components but not others. Evidence on the causal connections between SES components and child outcomes is summarized. Both experimental and quasi‐experimental studies involving manipulation of family income have demonstrated consistent associations with a number of cognitive measures. Quasi‐experimental increases in maternal education have also shown associations with child achievement. We end with a discussion of useful directions in SES‐related cognitive research. WIREs Cogn Sci 2012, 3:377–386. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1176 This article is categorized under: Neuroscience > Cognition

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wcs.1176

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duncan, G. J., & Magnuson, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Duncan, Greg J.
Venue
WIREs Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-02
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
377-386
ISSN
  • 1939-5078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-5086
OpenAlex
W2122122137
Cited by
420
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
socioeconomic status, child cognitive development, household income, maternal education, occupational status, educational attainment, causal inference, socioeconomic status measurement, family resources, child achievement, policy implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review