Cited by 368Personality Traits and PsychologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and Development

The development of multiple domains of child and adolescent self-concept: A cohort sequential longitudinal design

Cole, David A, Maxwell, Scott E, Martin, Joan M, Peeke, Lachlan G, Seroczynski, A D, Tram, Jane M, Hoffman, Kit B, Ruiz, Mark D +2 more·2001·Child Development

Abstract

The development of child and adolescent self-concept was examined as a function of the self-concept domain, social/developmental/educational transitions, and gender. In two overlapping age cohorts of public school students (Ns = 936 and 984), five dimensions of self-concept were evaluated every 6 months in a manner that spanned grades 3 through 11 (representing the elementary, middle, and high school years). Domains of self-concept included academic competence, physical appearance, behavioral conduct, social acceptance, and sports competence. Structural equation modeling addressed questions about the stability of individual differences over time. Multilevel modeling addressed questions about mean-level changes in self-concept over time. Significant effects emerged with regard to gender, age, dimension of self-concept, and educational transition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-8624.00375

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have obtained empirical support for the view that cognitive vulnerabilities transition from mediators to moderators of the relation between negative life events and depression.

    “Several studies have obtained empirical support for this view (Cole et al., 2001; Tram & Cole, 2000; Uhrlass & Gibb, 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E., Martin, J. M., Peeke, L. G., Seroczynski, A. D., Tram, J. M., Hoffman, K. B., Ruiz, M. D., Jacquez, F., & Maschman, T.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • Bethel College (US)
Venue
Child Development
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
1723-1746
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2143278416
Cited by
368
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
self-concept, adolescent development, academic competence, physical appearance, behavior, social acceptance, sport competence, gender differences, educational transitions, developmental transitions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Development, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Self Concept, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review