Cited by 317Social and Intergroup PsychologyBehavioral Health and InterventionsMemory Processes and Influences

Do Amnesics Exhibit Cognitive Dissonance Reduction? The Role of Explicit Memory and Attention in Attitude Change

Lieberman, Matthew D., Ochsner, Kevin N., Gilbert, Daniel T., Schacter, Daniel L.·2001·Psychological Science

Abstract

In two studies, we investigated the roles of explicit memory and attentional resources in the process of behavior-induced attitude change. Although most theories of attitude change (cognitive dissonance and self-perception theories) assume an important role for both mechanisms, we propose that behavior-induced attitude change can be a relatively automatic process that does not require explicit memory for, or consciously controlled processing of, the discrepancy between attitude and behavior. Using a free-choice paradigm, we found that both amnesics and normal participants under cognitive load showed as much attitude change as did control participants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9280.00323

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The negative affective state resulting from conflicting representations may or may not be something the subject is aware of.

    “although this negative affective state may or may not be something the subject is aware of (Lieberman et al., 2001 and see also Winkielman & Berridge, 2004 on unconscious affect and unconscious emotions in general as well as Berger, Nanay, & Quilty‐Dunn, 2018 for a philosophical summary).”

    From Conative Dissonance (2026) · cites this paper as Lieberman et al., 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lieberman, M. D., Ochsner, K. N., Gilbert, D. T., & Schacter, D. L.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Lieberman, Matthew D.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2001-03
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
135-140
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2100184858
Cited by
317
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
FWCI
28.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH056075, R01 MH56075)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-26985, P50NS026985)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
amnesia, cognitive dissonance, attitude change, declarative memory, attention, self-perception theory, free-choice paradigm, cognitive load, automatic processing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Attention, Attitude, Cognitive Dissonance, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Case-Control Studies, Amnesia, Anterograde

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review