Cited by 318Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFree Will and AgencyDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The Inherent Reward of Choice

Open access
Leotti, Lauren A., Delgado, Mauricio R.·2011·Psychological Science

Abstract

Research suggests that the exercise of control is desirable and adaptive, but the precise mechanisms underlying the affective value of control are not well understood. The study reported here characterized the affective experience of personal control by examining the neural substrates recruited when individuals anticipate the opportunity to make a choice—in other words, when they anticipate the means for exercising control. We used an experimental paradigm that probed the value of having a choice. Participants reported liking cues that predicted a future opportunity to make a choice more than cues that predicted no choice. The anticipation of choice itself was associated with increased activity in corticostriatal regions, particularly the ventral striatum, involved in affective and motivational processes. This study is the first direct examination of the affective value of having the opportunity to choose. These findings have important implications for understanding the role of perception of control, and choice itself, in self-regulatory processes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797611417005

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In healthy controls, personally chosen vs. passively received rewards elicit stronger activation in the striatum (ventral and dorsal) and PFC (inferior frontal gyrus), which is inversely related to depressive symptoms.

    “studies in healthy controls have shown that personally chosen vs. passively received rewards elicit stronger activation in the striatum (ventral and dorsal) and PFC (inferior frontal gyrus) [212-215], which is inversely related to depressive symptoms [212].”

    From Prefrontal cortex and depression (2022) · cites this paper as [213]

    The Results (Neuroimaging Results; page unavailable) report greater ventral-striatal activity for Choice than No-choice cues, and main effects of cue type in dorsal striatum and right inferior frontal cortex. The study measured anticipation of an opportunity to choose, not activation elicited by receipt of personally chosen rewards. Our copy does not report an inverse relationship with depressive symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Allowing individuals to exercise control over the environment may satisfy a basic psychological need and may be a biological necessity.

    “Allowing individuals to exercise control over the environment may not only satisfy a basic psychological need (Deci & Ryan, 2000;2008;White, 1959) but may be a biological necessity (Leotti & Delgado, 2011;Leotti, Iyengar, Ochsner, 2010).”
  • Reward circuitry can be activated in the absence of extrinsic incentives when simply making a choice and when difficulty is greater.

    “Reward circuitry can be activated in the absence of extrinsic incentives when simply making a choice (Leotti and Delgado, 2011) and when difficulty is greater (Schouppe et al., 2014).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leotti, L. A., & Delgado, M. R.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Delgado, Mauricio R.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2011-09-19
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
1310-1318
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2147877980
Cited by
318
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-084041, R01MH084081, R21MH084041)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-027764, F32DA027308, R01DA027764)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
perceived control, personal control, ventral striatum, corticostriatal circuits, self-regulation, motivation
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Choice Behavior, Cues, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review