Cited by 179Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlStress Responses and CortisolNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The rhythm of the heart in the blink of an eye: emotion-modulated startle magnitude covaries with heart rate variability

Ruiz‐Padial, Elisabeth, Sollers, John J., Vila, Jaime, Thayer, Julian F.·2003·Psychophysiology

Abstract

Emotion-modulated startle is a robust phenomenon that has been demonstrated in a wide range of experimental situations. Similarly, heart rate variability (HRV) has been associated with a diverse range of processes including affective and attentional regulation. The present study sought to examine the relationship between these two important measures of affective behavior. Ninety female participants viewed pleasant, neutral, and unpleasant pictures while exposed to acoustic startle stimuli. The eyeblink startle was recorded both during the affective foregrounds and during intertrial intervals. HRV was assessed during a resting baseline and relationships between HRV and startle magnitudes examined. Results indicated that resting HRV was inversely related to startle magnitude during both intertrial intervals and affective foregrounds. In addition, the participants with the highest HRV showed the most differentiated emotion-modulated startle effects, whereas those with the lowest HRV, compared to those with the highest HRV, showed significantly potentiated startle to neutral foregrounds and marginally potentiated startle to pleasant foregrounds. The findings are consistent with models that posit that prefrontal cortical activity modulates subcortical motivation circuits. These results have important implications for the use of startle probe methodology and for HRV in the study of emotional regulation and dysregulation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1469-8986.00032

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruiz‐Padial, E., Sollers, J. J., Vila, J., & Thayer, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Jaén (ES)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
Corresponding author
Thayer, Julian F.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-25
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
306-313
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2107861404
Cited by
179
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
heart rate variability, acoustic startle response, emotion regulation, prefrontal cortex, startle potentiation, emotional arousal
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Electrocardiography, Electromyography, Emotions, Facial Muscles, Female, Heart, Humans, Reflex, Startle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review