Cited by 56Smoking Behavior and CessationHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Meditation-induced changes in high-frequency heart rate variability predict smoking outcomes

Open access
Libby, Daniel J., Worhunsky, Patrick D., Pilver, Corey E., Brewer, Judson A.·2012·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV) is a measure of parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) output that has been associated with enhanced self-regulation. Low resting levels of HF-HRV are associated with nicotine dependence and blunted stress-related changes in HF-HRV are associated with decreased ability to resist smoking. Meditation has been shown to increase HF-HRV. However, it is unknown whether tonic levels of HF-HRV or acute changes in HF-HRV during meditation predict treatment responses in addictive behaviors such as smoking cessation. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between HF-HRV and subsequent smoking outcomes. METHODS: HF-HRV during resting baseline and during mindfulness meditation was measured within two weeks of completing a 4-week smoking cessation intervention in a sample of 31 community participants. Self-report measures of smoking were obtained at a follow up 17-weeks after the initiation of treatment. RESULTS: Regression analyses indicated that individuals exhibiting acute increases in HF-HRV from resting baseline to meditation smoked fewer cigarettes at follow-up than those who exhibited acute decreases in HF-HRV (b = -4.89, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Acute changes in HF-HRV in response to meditation may be a useful tool to predict smoking cessation treatment response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00054

Cites

86 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physiological changes such as heart rate and galvanic skin response correlate with internal emotional responses.

    “Physiological changes such as heart rate and galvanic skin response (GSR), among others, correlate with internal emotional responses (Libby et al., 2012).”

    From Repetitive Religious Chanting Modulates the Late-Stage Brain Response to Fear- and Stress-Provoking Pictures (2017) · cites this paper as Libby et al., 2012

    The paper’s discussion of HF-HRV and psychological conditions says that negative affect can accompany an acute increase in heart rate. It does not address galvanic skin response, so the citation supports the heart-rate portion but not the claim about GSR. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness meditation and its neural correlates have been investigated in several studies by means of block-design fMRI.

    “Mindfulness meditation and its neural correlates have been investigated in several studies [36, 81] by means of block-design fMRI.”

    From State and training effects of mindfulness meditation on brain networks reflect neuronal mechanisms of its antidepressant effect (2016) · cites this paper as [81]

    The Materials and methods sections describe mindfulness meditation performed in an fMRI scanner in blocked runs. But Participants says the fMRI data would be presented elsewhere; this paper does not report neural correlates of meditation. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jennings J. R. Gianaros P. J. (2007). “Methodology,” in Handbook of Psychophysiology, eds Cacioppo J. T. Tassinary L. G. Berntson G. G. (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press). 812– 833
  2. McDonald A. H. (1980). “Mechanisms affecting heart-rate,” in The Study of Heart Rate Variability, eds Kitney R. I. Rompelman O. (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 3– 11

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Libby, D. J., Worhunsky, P. D., Pilver, C. E., & Brewer, J. A.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Brewer, Judson A.
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2012
Volume
6
Pages
54-54
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999320311
Cited by
56
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Yale University (P50-DA09241)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA-00167, DA09241., K12 DA00167, P50-DA-0-9241)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
high-frequency heart rate variability, mindfulness meditation, smoking cessation, nicotine dependence, parasympathetic nervous system, treatment response prediction, self-regulation, stress response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review